How do politicians respond to opinion polls? An experiment with Swedish politicians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13017014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G Schumacher (0000-0002-6503-4514, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author), Patrik Öhberg (0000-0002-7433-8552, University of Gothenburg) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Research & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-1680 • E-ISSN: 2053-1680 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2053168020955106 |
| OpenAlex | W3085287811 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 20 |
Do politicians demand change if party support is slipping in opinion polls? If so, should a party change its program or just the way it communicates with voters? To investigate this, we conducted a survey experiment with 1236 Swedish politicians. We exposed them to a frame in which their party was losing in the polls, or a frame in which their party was gaining in the polls without using deception. Our results demonstrate that losing politicians seek change, both in terms of program and communication. However, the effects of the most recent polls are typically stronger than our experimental treatment. Along those lines we also find that politicians who are losing in recent polls, but not in our experimental treatment, favor ideological radicalization more than moderation or staying put. With these results our study paper speaks to the discussion on how representation is achieved and whether opinion polls are good or bad for democracy
Ideology · Opinion poll · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Different signals, same message? Evidence of mainstream accommodation of the radical right on European integration using parliamentary speeches
The politician, the press and the public
Flirting with Autocracy in Indonesia
The legislative cost of ruling
The IRR as False Witness
Oscillations in Perceptual Accuracy
Parties’ Ideological Cores and Peripheries
Opposition parties seek more conflict with the government when losing electoral support
Mechanisms of Political Responsiveness
Prospect Theory
Transforming Stability into Change
Off the Fence, Onto the Bandwagon? A Large-Scale Survey Experiment on Effect of Real-Life Poll Outcomes on Subsequent Vote Intentions
Party-constrained Policy Responsiveness
Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections
Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections
Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness
Party performance explains disagreement between politicians and their parties
Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives
How Election Polls Shape Voting Behaviour
Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs
Of horseshoes and horse races
Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation
Party Representatives’ Adaptation to Election Results
What Moves Parties
How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change
Government versus Opposition at the Polls
Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies
Learning on the job? Adapting party campaign strategy to changing information on the local political context
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |