Advisors or Enablers? Bringing Professional Service Providers into the Guiding Principles’ Fold

Bibliographic Data

ID13019331
AuthorsAnita Ramasastry (0000-0001-8809-9364, University of Washington, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume6
Issue2
Pages293-311
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBusiness and Human Rights Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2057-0198 • E-ISSN: 2057-0201
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/bhj.2021.28
OpenAlexW3174302650
LanguageEN
Citations received5

After a decade, different businesses adhere to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Some key commercial entities, however, remain largely outside of the UNGPs universe, including professional service providers (PSPs) who are retained by businesses to provide expert advice and services. These advisors include lawyers, management consultants, architects and others. Some may have specialized units that provide advice on the UNGPs when retained solely for that purpose. But when asked to provide general commercial legal advice, to design a building, or restructure a business, such advisors do not typically appear to apply the UNGPs, to identify negative human rights impacts and tailor their advice in a way that prevents or mitigates such impacts. This article explores the connection between the advice provided by PSPs and negative human rights impacts. It underscores the critical need for these advisors to align their business processes and advisory services with the UNGPs to avoid being enablers of human rights abuses

Advice (programming · Business · Human rights · Human services · Legal advice · Political science · Public relations · Restructuring · Service (business · Service provider · Computer Science · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Law · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Finance · Marketing

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access