Critical security research and the war on terror

Contemporary reckoning with the catastrophic outcomes of the post-9/11 era opens important questions for the future of counterterrorism policy. It also raises significant issues for thinking through the future priorities and purposes of security scholarship. In this article we make two core claims. First, recent years have seen considerable mainstreaming of ostensibly critical ideas on (counter)terrorism within political debate, media commentary, and – crucially – security policy. Second, such ideas – including around the futility of ‘war’ on terror; the ineffectiveness of torture; the unstable framing of threats such as radicalisation; and the inefficiency of excessive counterterrorism expenditure – were widely dismissed as lacking in policy relevance, even being utopian, when articulated by critically oriented scholars. This development, we argue, raises important ontological questions around the ending of security paradigms such as the war on terror. It also prompts vital political, epistemological, and normative questions around the status of overtly critical scholarship when its ideas and recommendations achieve wider currency

Mainstream · Political science · Terrorism · War on terror · Global Security and Public Health · Law

• Strategies of Critique in Vernacular Security Discourse

  Open Access•Lee Jarvis•Journal of Global Security Studies•2025

  Add to list

• Uhud, Kairouan and the battle of Ben Gardane

  Open Access•Christopher Ruddy, Shannon Brincat•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2026

  Add to list