The comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU
Lessons and policy implications
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13022350 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabina Lacmanović (0000-0003-2827-1307, corresponding author), Tea Hasić (0000-0001-6079-1156), Marinko Škare (0000-0001-6426-3692) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 234-256 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economics & Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2071-789X • E-ISSN: 2306-3459 |
| Publisher | Centre of Sociological Research, NGO (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14254/2071-789x.2024/17-4/13 |
| OpenAlex | W4406752928 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
This study conducts a comparative analysis of hybrid purpose companies in the EU, focusing on Società Benefit in Italy, Sociedades de Beneficio e Interés Común (SBIC) in Spain, and Société à Mission in France. These companies pursue public benefits alongside profit-making, representing an innovative legal framework to address contemporary environmental, social, and economic challenges. The research objectives include systematically evaluating and comparing the legal frameworks with a focus on directors' responsibilities, transparency requirements, and control mechanisms; analysing the organisational perspective of acquiring benefit corporation status; presenting key statistics on growth trends, sectoral distribution, and performance indicators; and comparing mission reports of relevant case studies. Qualitative data analysis was implemented using publicly available secondary data and case study analysis. The results show significant similarities and specific differences between the models, especially in control mechanisms. The Italian model provides stakeholders with public enforcement mechanisms against misleading practices, while the French model relies on mission committees and independent third-party assessments. The Spanish model, introduced in 2022, is expected to develop similar control mechanisms. The growth trends and overall performance indicate that companies recognise the value of adopting this legal framework. The comparative analysis provides valuable insights for EU countries considering introducing similar hybrid-purpose models
Business · Industrial organization · Corporate Governance and Law · EU Law and Policy Analysis · Regional Development and Policy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |