Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Insights into Intimate Partner Violence

Exploring Predictive Factors in Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys 2018

Bibliographic Data

ID13025017
AuthorsGeorge Prince Atta (0009-0000-0182-0674, University of Saskatchewan, corresponding author), Paul Newton (0000-0001-5187-5665, University of Saskatchewan), Timothy Shah (0000-0002-5328-7899, University of Saskatchewan, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume15
Issue4
Pages100-100
Publication date2025-04-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocieties (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2075-4698 • E-ISSN: 2075-4698
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/soc15040100
OpenAlexW4409442589
LanguageEN
References cited21

Intimate partner violence (IPV) continues to be a serious public health issue, particularly in Ghana. It is crucial to create evidence-based, preventative measures to stop IVP. This study empirically investigated the factors related to married women’s perceptions of male IPV against women. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Goal 5.2) advocate for the elimination of male violence against women by governments, hence this study contributes to monitoring the progress being made. This study employed cross-sectional secondary data from Ghana Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) conducted in 2018 with a sample of 14,237 women aged 15–49. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions, and the results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Women’s justification of male IPV against women was correlated with socio-demographic factors such as education level, marital status, age of the woman, area of residence (rural or urban), ethnic background, and economic disadvantage (wealth status). Higher educated women (OR 0.248 [95% CI 0.185–0.332, p < 0.001]) were less likely to justify male IPV against women than women with no/less formal education. Women who were in the richest quintile (OR 0.766 [95% CI 0.634–0.926, p = 0.006]) were less likely than those in the poorest/lowest quintile to rationalize/justify intimate partner violence. In terms of ethnicity of the household head, the Ga/Dangme (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.714–1.036, p = 0.112]) had lower odds of justifying male IPV against women compared to the Akan. The government, through the Ministry of Gender and Child Protection and women’s advocacy groups, should devise strategies, programs, and policies to empower women through formal education and economically through job training and employment support for women and victims to help them achieve financial independence and reduce negative attitudes toward women and the prevalence of male IPV against women

Cluster (spacecraft · Domestic violence · Environmental health · Geography · Poison control · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Psychology

  • Violence Against Women

    Open Access•Lori Heise, Lori L Heise•Violence Against Women•1998

  • Structural and Institutional Barriers to Help-Seeking among Female Victims of Intimate Partner Violence in Ghana

    Open Access•Emmanuel Rohn, E Y Tenkorang•Journal of Family Violence•2022

  • Intimate Partner Violence Against Married Women in Uganda

    Open Access•Emmanuelle G Ogland, X Xu et al.•Journal of Family Violence•2014

  • Women's Empowerment and Intimate Partner Violence

    Somdeep Chatterjee, Prashant Poddar•Economic Development and Cultural…•2024

  • Women's Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence in Sindh, Pakistan

    Open Access•Faisal Abbas, Verda Salman•Journal of Family Issues•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae