Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Toward Gender Understanding

Examining Ambivalent Sexism among University Students and Its Impact on Faculty Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID13025240
AuthorsAmaia Yurrebaso (0000-0001-8898-7089, Universidad de Salamanca, corresponding author), Raquel Guzmán-Ordaz (0000-0002-8858-7146, Universidad de Salamanca), Eva María Picado-Valverde (0000-0002-7288-6985, Universidad de Salamanca), Álvaro Jáñez (0000-0002-6861-1743, Universidad de Salamanca)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue4
Pages48-48
Publication date2024-04-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocieties (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2075-4698 • E-ISSN: 2075-4698
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/soc14040048
OpenAlexW4394579962
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited25

This study examines gender differences in levels of sexism among university students and evaluates variations in assessing sexist attitudes toward professors. The aim is to analyze potential disparities between men and women regarding ambivalent sexism (both hostile and benevolent) and to determine if these differences influence the evaluation of specific behaviors by teaching faculty. Additionally, the present study seeks to validate the variability hypothesis, asserting that men are over-represented in the extremes of distributions compared to women concerning analyzed sexist attitudes. Eighty university students participated voluntarily and anonymously, completing three questionnaires on ambivalent sexism, neosexism, and the assessment of sexist behaviors by their instructors. Consistent with prior research, the results reveal higher levels of sexism among men in this context. Despite these differences, both men and women align in evaluating specific behaviors in teaching faculty, irrespective of their individual levels of sexism. Finally, the data presented support the variability hypothesis, indicating greater variability in sexist attitudes among men than women. These findings suggest that general attitudes assessed in most questionnaires might not be representative of the behaviors and attitudes that people display in real specific situations. This could change how future research and interventions approach these issues

Ambivalence · Gender bias · Pedagogy · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Gender-Based Violence Against Women in Universities of Greece

    Open Access•Stefanos Balaskas, Ioanna Yfantidou•Societies•2026

  • El biodrama como dispositivo para transformar las violencias de género en la juventud ecuatoriana

    Open Access•Paz Guarderas-Albuja, Cynthia Carofilis-Cedeño et al.•AMÉRICA LATINA HOY•2025

  • Sexismo ambivalente

    Open Access•Francisca Expósito, Miguel Moya et al.•International Journal of Social…•1998

  • Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior

    Wendy Wood, Alice H Eagly•Advances in experimental social…•2012

  • Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?

    Open Access•Jeff Archer, John Archer•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2009

  • Benevolent Sexism and Hostile Sexism Across the Ages

    Open Access•Matthew D Hammond, Petar Milojev et al.•Social Psychological and…•2018

  • Social Comparison and Social Psychology

    Open Access•A P Buunk, Thomas Mussweiler et al.•Social Comparison and Social…•2005

  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice

    Open Access•Chris Sibley, Oliver Sng et al.•Cambridge Handbook of the…•2016

  • Neosexism

    Open Access•Francine Tougas, Rupert Brown et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1995

  • Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology

    Open Access•Alice H Eagly, Wendy Wood•Sex Roles•2013

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism

    Open Access•David M Bu, David Michael Buss et al.•Sex Roles•2011

  • The Variability Hypothesis

    Stephanie A Shields•Signs: Journal of Women in…•1982

  • The Shaping of Science by Ideology

    Open Access•Alice H Eagly•Journal of Social Issues•2018

  • The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory

    Paul Glick, Peter Glick et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation

    Open Access•G Adams, Donna M Garcia et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys

    Frauke Kreuter, Stanley Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Flattering to deceive

    Aife Hopkins-Doyle, Robbie M Sutton et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2019

  • Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy

    Paul Glick, Peter Glick et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae