Toward Gender Understanding
Examining Ambivalent Sexism among University Students and Its Impact on Faculty Evaluation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13025240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amaia Yurrebaso (0000-0001-8898-7089, Universidad de Salamanca, corresponding author), Raquel Guzmán-Ordaz (0000-0002-8858-7146, Universidad de Salamanca), Eva María Picado-Valverde (0000-0002-7288-6985, Universidad de Salamanca), Álvaro Jáñez (0000-0002-6861-1743, Universidad de Salamanca) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 48-48 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Societies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2075-4698 • E-ISSN: 2075-4698 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/soc14040048 |
| OpenAlex | W4394579962 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 25 |
This study examines gender differences in levels of sexism among university students and evaluates variations in assessing sexist attitudes toward professors. The aim is to analyze potential disparities between men and women regarding ambivalent sexism (both hostile and benevolent) and to determine if these differences influence the evaluation of specific behaviors by teaching faculty. Additionally, the present study seeks to validate the variability hypothesis, asserting that men are over-represented in the extremes of distributions compared to women concerning analyzed sexist attitudes. Eighty university students participated voluntarily and anonymously, completing three questionnaires on ambivalent sexism, neosexism, and the assessment of sexist behaviors by their instructors. Consistent with prior research, the results reveal higher levels of sexism among men in this context. Despite these differences, both men and women align in evaluating specific behaviors in teaching faculty, irrespective of their individual levels of sexism. Finally, the data presented support the variability hypothesis, indicating greater variability in sexist attitudes among men than women. These findings suggest that general attitudes assessed in most questionnaires might not be representative of the behaviors and attitudes that people display in real specific situations. This could change how future research and interventions approach these issues
Ambivalence · Gender bias · Pedagogy · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Sexismo ambivalente
Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior
Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?
Benevolent Sexism and Hostile Sexism Across the Ages
Social Comparison and Social Psychology
The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice
Neosexism
Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism
The Variability Hypothesis
The Shaping of Science by Ideology
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation
Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys
Flattering to deceive
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |