Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

To Reform the Child Protection System in Portugal—Stakeholders’ Positions

Bibliographic Data

ID13025804
AuthorsElisete Diogo (0000-0002-5303-8585, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, corresponding author), Joana Silva (0000-0001-5816-2035, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre), Bárbara Mourão Sacur (Universidade Católica Portuguesa)
Year2024
Volume13
Issue9
Pages443-443
Publication date2024-08-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci13090443
OpenAlexW4401884727
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

Notwithstanding the legal milestones observed in the Portuguese child protection system (CPS), several concerns call for political action to ensure the effective guarantee of children’s rights. In this context, it is imperative to discuss proposals for reforming the CPS. Agreement on these proposals by the stakeholders in the system is key to validating and improving the system. Therefore, the main research questions of the present study are (1) what is the level of agreement among stakeholders in the CPS on certain proposals for child protection reform? and (2) what are the positions on those proposals? Mixed methods were conducted based on an online survey (n = 292), supported by Qualtrics, and eight focus groups involving stakeholders as former beneficiaries, families, practitioners and academics (n = 18). Findings show a harmonious alignment with the proposals, justifying an urgent reform of the CPS and the need to strengthen a child-centred system. Three themes emerged: promotion of quality family-based care and promotion of adoption; development of child-friendly terminology; and improvement of the CPS administration. The conclusions highlight implications for policy and practice

Action (physics · Business · Child protection · Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Politics · Portuguese · Promotion (chess · Public relations · Terminology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Children's Rights and Participation · Law · Public Administration

  • Limits of Public Discretion of Guardianship and Custody Authorities

    Open Access•Kirill Vital'evich Zotov•Право и политика•2026

  • Child Protection Systems

    Neil Gilbert, Nigel Parton et al.•Child protection systems•2011

  • The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare

    Open Access•Berit Skauge, Anita Skårstad Storhaug et al.•Social Sciences•2021

  • Focus group methodology

    Open Access•Joe Sims, Jackie Waterfield•Quality & Quantity•2019

  • The EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child and the European Child Guarantee—Evidence-Based Recommendations for Alternative Care

    Open Access•Bárbara Mourão Sacur, Elisete Diogo•Children•2021

  • Surviving not thriving”

    Open Access•Madelaine Smales, Melissa Savaglio et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Identifying families who may be struggling after adoption or guardianship

    Open Access•Nancy Rolock, Kerrie Ocasio et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2020

  • Developing family-based care

    Jennifer Davidson, Ian Milligan et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2016

  • Nurturing the virtuous circle

    Open Access•Autumn Roesch-Marsh, Autumn Roesch‐Marsh et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2016

  • Children's participation in child protection—How do practitioners understand children's participation in practice

    Open Access•Elise Woodman, Steven Roche et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Changes in Participant Interactions. Using Focus Group Analysis Methodology to Explore the Impact on Participant Interactions of Face-to-Face Versus Online Video Data Collection Methods

    Open Access•Joanna De Souza, Karen Gillett et al.•International Journal of…•2024

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae