Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluation of the Drive Intervention for High-Harm Domestic Abuse Perpetrators in England and Wales Using a Quasi-Experimental Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID13027242
AuthorsMarianne Hester (0000-0003-2241-651X, University of Bristol), Ana G Ortega‐Avila (0000-0002-8269-9147, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico), Nathan Eisenstadt (0009-0003-6045-4899, University of Bristol), Sarah-Jane Walker (0000-0002-3073-7957, University of Bristol)
Year2025
Volume14
Issue2
Pages55-55
Publication date2025-01-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci14020055
OpenAlexW4406669154
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited23

High-risk and high-harm domestic abuse perpetrators pose the greatest risk of serious harm to (ex-)partners and family members. Robust evidence of perpetrator intervention is lacking for this group. The Drive perpetrator intervention in the United Kingdom focuses specifically on high-harm perpetrators to reduce abuse and increase safety of victims, using individual case management via support and disruption, co-ordinated multi-agency response and targeted support to victims. This paper reports on evaluation of the Drive pilot. A high quality quasi-experimental approach with individually randomised intervention and controls was applied in three areas in England and Wales. High-risk perpetrators (N = 2627) were allocated randomly to either Drive or usual care (support to victim). Change in safety and risk for Drive-associated victims was compared with the usual care victim group. Longer-term outcomes were assessed before, during and 12 months following the intervention for Drive and control group perpetrators at one site. The Drive intervention reduced abusive perpetrator behaviours and increased safety for victims compared to the control. The reduction in perpetration by both serial and repeat perpetrators sustained for a year after the end of the intervention and was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for Drive perpetrators compared to the control

Criminology · Harm · Intervention (counseling · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Unlocking participation

    Open Access•Nathan Eisenstadt, Daisy Gaunt et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2026

  • Education Groups for Men Who Batter

    Ellen Pence, Michael Paymar•Education Groups for Men Who Batter•1993

  • Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment

    Open Access•Julia C Babcock, Julia Babcock et al.•Clinical Psychology Review•2004

  • Male IPV Perpetrator’s Perspectives on Intervention and Change

    Open Access•Tony McGinn, Mary McColgan et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2020

  • Rapid Review of Men’s Behavior Change Programs

    Open Access•Amanda O’Connor, Heather Morris et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2021

  • Evaluating the Impact of Intimate Partner Violence

    Open Access•Berta Vall, Anna Sala‐Bubaré et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Methodological Challenges in Group-based Randomised Controlled Trials for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators

    Open Access•William Turner, Kàren Morgan et al.•Psychosocial Intervention•2023

  • Toward an experimental ecology of human development

    Urie Bronfenbrenner•American Psychologist•1977

  • Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models

    Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ro et al.•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1961

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae