Moscow — the Third Rome? Between the Founding Myth and the Destructive Mirage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13029104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francine-Dominique Liechtenhan (0000-0001-7220-3534, Centre Roland Mousnier, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 11 (109) |
| Pages | 0-0 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Istoriya (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2079-8784 • E-ISSN: 2079-8784 |
| Publisher | Ltd Integration: Education and Science (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.18254/s207987840017646-9 |
| OpenAlex | W4205219096 |
| Language | EN |
Thanks a new Italian and German historiography, the concept of the “Third Rome” is approached more critically than that applied by the historians of the 19th century. This idea is part of an eschatological historiosophy, born in Muscovy following the refusal of the union signed during the Council of Florence. The Russian princes and Church found themselves at the head of the Orthodox Ecumene and thus avoided positioning as successors to the Byzantine Empire. The theory of the Third Rome, developed by Philotheus, never became an official ideology; it was understood as translatio religionis and not as translatio imperii, with Holy Russia positioning itself as the home of the true faith
Ancient history · Archaeology · Byzantine architecture · Byzantine studies · Empire · Faith · German · Historiography · Ideology · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Classics · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · History · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|