Historia i struktura. Problem uprawomocnienia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13031729 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrzej Leder (0000-0002-1702-3706, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 132-132 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Praktyka Teoretyczna (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2081-8130 • E-ISSN: 2081-8130 |
| Publisher | Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14746/prt.2016.4.7 |
| OpenAlex | W2737402216 |
| Language | EN |
In his text the author is defining the conflict of the structuralist and historicist – synchronic and diachronic thought – described by de Saussure–- as a development of two different ethical axioms in the field of social philosophy. He tries to show, how each of this axioms can generate a different ontology of social being. Applying some elements of Deleuzian thought the author analyzes the theoretical position of the two ethical axioms. Then, on the fundament of the Lacanian, and more generally poststructuralist thought he tries to give a draft of a theoretical space in which such a change of ethical positions would be possible. He develops thus a new philosophy of symbolic fields
Axiom · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Historicism · Linguistics · Ontology · Pure mathematics · Social ontology · Sociology · Education and Cultural Studies · Language and Culture · Mathematics · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|