Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Historia i struktura. Problem uprawomocnienia

Bibliographic Data

ID13031729
AuthorsAndrzej Leder (0000-0002-1702-3706, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume22
Issue4
Pages132-132
Publication date2016-12-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePraktyka Teoretyczna (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2081-8130 • E-ISSN: 2081-8130
PublisherAdam Mickiewicz University Poznan (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.14746/prt.2016.4.7
OpenAlexW2737402216
LanguageEN

In his text the author is defining the conflict of the structuralist and historicist – synchronic and diachronic thought – described by de Saussure–- as a development of two different ethical axioms in the field of social philosophy. He tries to show, how each of this axioms can generate a different ontology of social being. Applying some elements of Deleuzian thought the author analyzes the theoretical position of the two ethical axioms. Then, on the fundament of the Lacanian, and more generally poststructuralist thought he tries to give a draft of a theoretical space in which such a change of ethical positions would be possible. He develops thus a new philosophy of symbolic fields

Axiom · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Historicism · Linguistics · Ontology · Pure mathematics · Social ontology · Sociology · Education and Cultural Studies · Language and Culture · Mathematics · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae