Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Elan-based multimodal discourse analysis of the interactive meanings and persuasive methods in criminal trials

Bibliographic Data

ID13032872
AuthorsHoda Zaiton (0009-0008-7890-6220, Pharos University in Alexandria, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume11
Issue4
Pages610-635
Publication date2025-10-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Semiotic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2096-031X • E-ISSN: 2751-7160
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/lass-2025-0053
OpenAlexW7089287320
LanguageEN
References cited19

Courtroom interaction is a distinct form of communication. It entails verbal and visual resources and abilities to express meaning, negotiate, and, hence, persuade. The discourse within criminal trials holds particular significance in determining the paradigm chosen by legal practitioners. The systemic-functional (SF) approach to multimodal discourse analysis explores meaning arises from the use of various semiotic systems in discourse. Primarily based on Systemic Functional Theory (SFT), and with an application of Aristotle’s three standards of persuasion: Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, this study proposes a multimodal persuasive approach to investigate the intersemiotic structures and systems of meaning and persuasive tactics that emerge when vocal and visual resources combine in a criminal courtroom trial. This entails looking at the various language manifestations as persuasive semiosis of useful oratory choice systems. For the goal of a deep, dynamic multimodal persuasion, this study employs ELAN, an interactive, cross-platform multimodal discourse analysis software. With the help of ELAN, annotations of videos and specifications of linguistic types and tiers can be achieved. The analysis reveals that legal discourse in courtrooms is constructed through “choices” made from within and outside linguistic confines. The resulting complex interactions between semiotic modes and material sources demonstrate the need for a multimodal approach to persuasion within the courtroom context

Discourse analysis · Meaning (existential · Modality (human–computer interaction · Multimodality · Persuasion · Semiosis · Semiotics · Social semiotics · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law in Society and Culture

  • Analyzing Multimodal Interaction

    Norri, Sigrid Norris•Analyzing Multimodal Interaction•2004

  • Gesture Visible Action as Utterance

    Open Access•Adam Kendon•Gesture•2004

  • Reading Images

    Gunther Kress, Teho Van Leeuwen et al.•Reading Images•2006

  • Speech, Music, Sound

    Open Access•T Van Leeuwen•Speech, Music, Sound•1999

  • Law and the Language of Identity

    G Matoesian, Gregory M Matoesian•Law and the language of identity•2001

  • Towards a semiotics of typography

    T Van Leeuwen•Information Design Journal•2006

  • Analysing the teachers’ use of gestures in the classroom

    Fei Victor Lim•Social Semiotics•2017

  • Interpersonal meaning, persuasion and public discourse

    J R Martins, James R Martin•Australian Journal of Linguistics•1995

  • Overt head movements and persuasion

    Pablo Briñol, Richard E Petty•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Persuasion and context

    Open Access•K Hyland•Journal of Pragmatics•1998

  • Reflections on the study of gesture1

    Adam Kendon•Visual Anthropology•1996

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae