Voting for Eurosceptic Parties and Societal Polarization in the Aftermath of the European Sovereign Debt Crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13036632 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maike Rump (0000-0002-3135-2442, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 145-162 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Statistics Politics and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2151-7509 • E-ISSN: 2194-6299 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/spp-2021-0033 |
| OpenAlex | W4281740847 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 31 |
The question of whether people voting for Eurosceptic parties in almost every European country is simply a democratic way of expressing a political opinion, or if it presents a threat to democracy by giving a voice to Eurosceptic parties that challenge the EU in a populist manner, has not lost its currency since the 2008 European sovereign dept crisis. In fact, at the first glance, the situation of anti-Corona protestors in Canada or Germany seems comparable. But contrary to some scholars, I argue that it was the economic crisis that first visualized the interdependency of the EU members to the citizens, and was, therefore, the ideal setting for populists to create an atmosphere of mistrust, with the help of the media in some countries. This Research Note addresses the undertheorized link between populism and crisis, by developing a theoretical model focussing on the aggregate level, which shows that EU-membership duration is a crucial factor in explaining voting for Eurosceptic parties. I use data from the European Social Survey and compare a period from 2002 to 2016, conducting trend analysis and difference-in-difference-estimation. My analysis reveals that Eurosceptic parties are more successful in those countries, where anti-EU protest has already been established before. In addition, I find a delayed crisis effect. This could be important for our understanding of the current Covid-19-crisis, which is a health crisis in first place, but a threat to democratic values and instrumentalized by populists as well
Democracy · Economic policy · Economics · European debt crisis · European integration · European union · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Populist Parties in Europe
Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression
Mostly Harmless Econometrics
The rationale of Brexit and the theories of European integration
Wenn Europa zum Problem wird – die Effekte der Finanzkrise auf Euroskeptizismus und nationales Wahlverhalten in Mittel- und Osteuropa
The European Sovereign Debt Crisis
The Manifesto Corpus
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism
Zur Transformation nationalstaatlicher Öffentlichkeit in Europa
A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration
The electoral consequences of austerity
The party politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis
The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis
The ‘Alternative for Germany
The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis
The paradox of nationalism
Opposition to European integration and fear of loss of national identity
Contemporary Euroscepticism in the party systems of the European Union candidate states of Central and Eastern Europe
A Touchstone of Dissent
Different Varieties of E uroscepticism? Conceptualizing and Explaining E uroscepticism in W estern E uropean Non‐Member States
Voter Responses to Fiscal Austerity
Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis
Euroscepticism Re‐galvanized
Making Austerity Popular
How to Perform Crisis
The Populist Zeitgeist
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |