Traditional Authority and State Legitimacy

Do African traditional leaders weaken state legitimacy at the local level? Past scholarship raises the possibility that unelected chiefs might undermine trust in national-level institutions. Relying on an original map of areas governed by chiefs and survey data from Namibia, this study examines whether respondents governed by traditional leaders are less likely to trust state institutions. The main finding is that compared to individuals not living under traditional authority, chiefdom residents are more likely to trust government institutions. Partially to alleviate the concern that chiefdom residence is endogenous to trust in national-level institutions, this article uses a genetic matching strategy to compare relatively similar individuals. A further finding is that the association between chiefdom residence and trust in state institutions is considerably weaker and less statistically significant for individuals who do not share ethnicity with their chief. This evidence suggests that traditional leaders’ ability to complement state institutions at the local level is compromised by ethnic diversity

Development economics · Economics · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · African history and culture analysis · Law · Public Administration

• Early Statehood and Support for Autocratic Rule in Africa

  Open Access•Vladimir Chlouba, Daniel Steven Smith et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  Add to list