Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Citizen Preferences and BCA

A Model of Willingness-to-Pay behind a Veil of Ignorance

Bibliographic Data

ID13037243
AuthorsMorgan Beeson (0000-0002-6322-7347, Newcastle University, corresponding author), Susan Chilton (0000-0003-2547-4467, Newcastle University), Hugh Metcalf (Newcastle University), Jytte Seested Nielsen (0000-0003-0129-0225, Newcastle University)
Year2024
Volume15
IssueS1
Pages183-205
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Benefit-Cost Analysis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2152-2812 • E-ISSN: 2194-5888
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/bca.2024.42
OpenAlexW4406338979
LanguageEN
References cited22

Public sector allocative decisions should reflect, as far as possible, the preferences of those affected by the decisions. Conventional benefit–cost analysis (BCA) will simply aggregate individuals’ private willingness-to-pay (WTP) over all affected individuals to estimate the total benefits of a policy that delivers a public good. Given the nature of a public good, it is not unreasonable to consider that an individual may have altruistic preferences over the consumption of the public good by others. In this paper, we set out the theoretical underpinnings for a new citizen-based WTP, informed by political philosophy. Our model extends the standard social utility model (Bergstrom, 2006) of WTP for a public good when individuals are altruists by incorporating a Veil of Ignorance (VoI; Harsanyi, 1955). Our findings show that our WTP (Citizen) correctly includes altruistic as well as distributional preferences of individuals in society into WTP for use in a BCA. When WTP (Citizen) are aggregated for use in a BCA, equal weight is given to each individual’s preference and the BCA will correctly identify potentially Pareto-improving projects in a consistent manner

Business · Economics · Ignorance · Microeconomics · Political science · Willingness to pay · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Accounting for the Distribution of Benefits and Costs in Benefit–Cost Analysis

    Open Access•James K Hammitt•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2020

  • Behavioral Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis

    Open Access•Lisa A Robinson, James K Hammitt•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2011

  • Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

    John C Harsanyi•Journal of Political Economy•1955

  • The Economics of Safety and Physical Risk

    Timothy Besley, Michael Jones‐lee et al.•Economica•1990

  • The Valuation of the Social Income

    John Hicks, J R Hicks•Economica•1940

  • Paternalistic Altruism and the Value of Statistical Life

    M W Jones-Lee, Michael Jones‐lee•The Economic Journal•1992

  • Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

    Open Access•Nicholas Kaldor•Philosophy of Economics•2007

  • Values, preferences, and the citizen-consumer distinction in cost-benefit analysis

    Open Access•Shepley Orr, Shepley W Orr•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae