Loyalties in Conflict
Mapam's Vacillating Stance on the Military Government, 1955-1966 Historical and Political Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13042298 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aviva Halamish (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Israeli Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2159-0370 • E-ISSN: 2159-0389 |
| Publisher | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3167/isf.2010.250202 |
| OpenAlex | W2151173209 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The article critically examines Mapam's activity regarding the Military Government imposed on Arab-populated areas between 1948 and 1966. It analyzes and compares the party's declared stand and its parliamentary activity with the role played by the issue as a factor in coalition negotiations. The article contends that the issue of the Military Government did not serve as a crucial factor in Mapam's decision either to join the coalition or to stay out of it. It also claims that Mapam did not have a direct influence on the actual decisions concerning the Military Government, due to Mapai's dominance in the Israeli political system in those years. The article suggests that the case of Mapam and the Military Government sheds light on the modus operandi of the Israeli political system prior to the Six Day War, on the extent of Mapai's dominance of the political system in Israel prior to the 1977 political upheaval, on the limited role and influence available to small parties in a dominant party system, and on the inherent conflict and potential collision between security considerations and democracy
Democracy · Dominance (genetics · Government (linguistics · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Political system · Politics · Sociology · African history and culture analysis · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |