Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Chinese infrastructural investments in the Balkans

Political implications of the highway project in Montenegro

Bibliographic Data

ID13045482
AuthorsMladen Grgić (University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume7
Issue1
Pages42-60
Publication date2017-08-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTerritory Politics Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2162-2671 • E-ISSN: 2162-268X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/21622671.2017.1359106
OpenAlexW2744269541
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited8

This article considers the political implications of Chinese investment in Montenegro and the geopolitical background of Chinese involvement in the country. Montenegro initiated construction of the highway connecting its port city of Bar to the border with Serbia. The ‘biggest project in Montenegrin history’ was dismissed by Western financial institutions as unfeasible and almost abandoned due to lack of finance. Finally, the Export-Import Bank of China (CHEXIM) offered generous financial resources while the Montenegrin government conceded strong state guarantees and gave the project to Chinese construction company CRBC. This article demystifies the political context of the project and Chinese involvement in Montenegro, offering a new academic contribution to geopolitics and Sino-Balkan studies. The paper also questions if Chinese loans offer something new to Montenegro and their potential conflict with the European Union, the most powerful stakeholder in the region. I use interviews with experts, official papers and leaked documents to analyse the background of the project

Business · China · Context (archaeology · Economic policy · Economics · Economy · European union · Geography · Geopolitics · Government (linguistics · Montenegro · Political science · Politics · Regional science · State (computer science · China's Global Influence and Migration · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security

  • Seeing China's Belt and Road

    Edward Schatz, Rachel Silvey•Seeing China's Belt and Road•2024

  • Two tigers in one mountain

    Open Access•Pengfei Hou•Asia Europe Journal•2024

  • The Western Balkans and the EU budget

    Open Access•Vasja Rant, Mojmir Mrak et al.•Journal of Southeast European and…•2020

  • Environment, development, and security politics in the production of Belt and Road spaces

    Julie Michelle Klinger•Territory Politics Governance•2019

  • The politics of public–private partnerships

    Trissia Wijaya, Alvin A Camba•Territory Politics Governance•2021

  • New geographies of development

    Julie Michelle Klinger, Joshua Muldavin•Territory Politics Governance•2019

  • Catching China-Europe trains

    Open Access•Wojciech Kębłowski•Eurasian Geography and Economics•2025

  • Reconciling different approaches to conceptualizing the glocalization of the Belt and Road Initiative projects

    Open Access•Yu-Wen Chen, Julie Yu-Wen Chen•Globalizations•2022

  • The EU Accession Process, Chinese Finance and Rising Corruption in Western Balkan Stabilitocracies

    Open Access•Diğdem Soyaltın•Europe Asia Studies•2022

  • Understanding Chinese influence in Europe

    Open Access•Andreea Budeanu, Shaun Breslin•Journal of European Integration•2025

  • Conceptualising Chinese transnational infrastructure projects in Europe and beyond

    Open Access•Frank Schaefer, Giles Mohan•Progress in Human Geography•2024

  • Belt and Road and China’s Attempt at Region Building in Central-East and Southeast Europe

    Open Access•Anastas Vangeli•Journal of Current Chinese Affairs•2020

  • Environmental governance of a Belt and Road project in Montenegro – National agency and external influences

    Open Access•Johanna Coenen, Jens Newig et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Diffusion of Influence? Detecting China’s Footprint in Foreign Policies of Other Countries

    Open Access•Richard Q Turcsányi, Kamil Liškutin et al.•Chinese Political Science Review•2022

  • China-backed infrastructure in the Global South

    Leolino Dourado•Third World Quarterly•2023

  • Funding of Transport Infrastructure in Serbia

    Open Access•Dániel Gábor Csapó•China Report•2021

  • De-risking, re-balancing and recentralising

    Open Access•Giles Mohan, Filippo Boni et al.•Political Geography•2024

  • Concrete and coal

    Open Access•Igor Rogelja•Political Geography•2020

  • World Development Report 1994

    World Bank•Infrastructure for development.•1994

  • Chinese State Capitalism? Rethinking the Role of the State and Business in Chinese Development Cooperation in Africa

    Open Access•Jing Gu, Chuanhong Zhang et al.•World Development•2016

  • Bureaucratic Politics and Overseas Investment by Chinese State-Owned Oil Companies

    Chih-Shian Liou•Asian Survey•2009

  • Rescaling China-Brazil Investment Relations in the Strategic Minerals Sector

    Open Access•Julie Michelle Klinger•Journal of Chinese Political…•2015

  • The Road from Capitalism to Capitalism

    Dimitris Dalakoglou•Mobilities•2012

  • The 'China model' and the global crisis

    Open Access•Shaun Breslin•International Affairs•2011

  • The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure

    Brian Larkin•Annual Review of Anthropology•2013

  • The road

    Open Access•Dimitris Dalakoglou•American Ethnologist•2010

Unique citing works18
Citations per year2,57
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 18

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae