Empowering Cybercrime Prevention through Digital Innovation Policy in Kenya
Opportunities and Implications
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13045834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kennedy Ogutu (0000-0002-6438-140X, University of Nairobi, corresponding author), Joseph Okeyo Obosi (0000-0003-1019-5502, University of Nairobi), Henry Amadi (0000-0002-6068-0779, University of Nairobi) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 04 |
| Pages | 749-769 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2164-0505 • E-ISSN: 2164-0513 |
| Publisher | Bentham Science Publishers (PUBLISHER • AE) |
| DOI | 10.4236/ojps.2025.154041 |
| OpenAlex | W4413403252 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
The article assessed Kenya’s ICT policy initiative focused on digital innovation empowerment, emphasizing its influence on cybercrime prevention and the unintended challenges that emerged during implementation. It utilized a cross-sectional research design combined with a concurrent mixed-methods approach. Primary data was collected from personnel within cybercrime prevention agencies, including mobile network operators like Airtel and Safaricom. To achieve the study’s aims, a simple linear regression model was applied for analysis. The article revealed that digital innovation empowerment significantly enhanced cybercrime prevention by equipping officers with advanced tools and strategies. Institutions directly involved in cyber operations showed stronger innovation adoption due to better infrastructure, leadership, and resource commitment. Conversely, regulatory bodies faced challenges like limited funding and weak integration. Overall, structural issues such as poor coordination, cultural resistance, and slow procurement hindered progress. The article concluded that digital innovation empowerment enhances cybercrime prevention, especially in operational institutions, but challenges like weak leadership, poor infrastructure, and bureaucratic hurdles limited broader institutional effectiveness. The article recommended a coordinated digital innovation framework, streamlined procurement, public-private partnerships, targeted capacity building, and strong monitoring systems to enhance cybercrime prevention and sustain impactful innovation efforts
Business · Cybercrime · Internet privacy · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Information and Cyber Security
| Highly cited | No |
|---|