Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Uzbek Wild Card in the New Great Game in Central Asia

Bibliographic Data

ID13047047
AuthorsRobert W Schaefer (corresponding author), Alasdair Whitney
Year2015
Volume4
Issue2
Pages291-308
Publication date2015-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRegion Regional Studies of Russia Eastern Europe and Central Asia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2165-0659 • E-ISSN: 2166-4307
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/reg.2015.0013
OpenAlexW1794650225
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Beginning in early 2013, US analysts detected a shift in Uzbekistan’s foreign policy—a move to increasingly rely on bilateralism as the basis for the state’s international relations. President Islam Karimov’s rejection of Russia’s self-proclaimed role of hegemon in Central Asia has likely contributed to this newfound policy approach that places Tashkent in a position to increase social and economic ties with the region’s emerging powerhouse—China. Although Uzbekistan has expressed consistent interest in establishing closer ties with the US, the withdrawal of US forces from the region diminishes the ability of the US to remain a plausible partner. This new approach to foreign relations will not fully prevent Uzbekistan from participating in the region’s multilateral organizations, but rather it is seen as an attempt to create some spacing between Tashkent and Moscow. This paper argues that active multistate cooperation between Uzbekistan, its Central Asian neighbors, and the region’s superpowers—Russia, China, and the United States—is necessary for the containment of extremism in Afghanistan following the International Security Assistnace Force drawdown in 2016. However, if Uzbekistan abandons multilateralism to the degree that neighboring Turkmenistan has and relies on the neorealist tenet of self-help in addressing political and security threats, the state will inevitably expose itself to Russian meddling. Uzbek cooperation with Vladimir Putin in the areas of economic development and security will continue but will be approached very cautiously due to the alarm resulting from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Bilateralism · Business · Central asia · China · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · International trade · Multilateralism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Territorial integrity · Uzbek · Central Asia Education and Culture · Law · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts · Russia and Soviet political economy

  • The 2022 protests in Karakalpakstan. From lost autonomy to regional identity consolidation

    Open Access•Slavomír Horák, Martin Lepič•Nationalities Papers•2025

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae