How to Calm the Storm and Recover Reputation? A fsQCA Analysis of Public Relations Effectiveness in Sports Organizations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13049499 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuxi He (0000-0001-5802-8063, Communication University of China), Shu Yang (0000-0001-7274-8497, Communication University of China), Zepei Wang (Communication University of China), Ke Zhang (0000-0002-1841-9016, Communication University of China), Aocheng Zhou (Tsinghua University), Yu Zou (0000-0001-8685-8355, Academy of Broadcasting Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communication & Sport (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2167-4795 • E-ISSN: 2167-4809 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21674795261428589 |
| OpenAlex | W7131630730 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
In recent years, the growing frequency of negative events in global sports has made crisis communication a critical issue for maintaining the credibility of sports organizations. Drawing on the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and employing fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), this study investigates 25 international sports crises to explore the multidimensional mechanisms influencing the effectiveness of sports public relations. Public relations effectiveness is conceptualized across two dimensions: reputation recovery and attention containment. And six key conditions are identified: crisis type, crisis severity, and prior reputation as crisis situational factors, and crisis response strategies, response speed, and information transparency as crisis communication factors. The findings reveal a multi-path structure: high reputation recovery is achieved through either the Attribution buffer Type or Transparency Repair Type mechanisms, while high attention containment emerges through the Strategy-Transparency Closure Type and Low-Severity Auto-Decay Type mechanisms. Among these, information transparency consistently serves as a core driver, whereas high prior reputation may trigger reputation backfire and sustained public scrutiny in high-responsibility and low-transparency contexts. This study offers a configurational perspective on crisis communication grounded in SCCT and provides empirical and practical insights for public relations in sports organizations
Credibility · Crisis communication · Empirical research · Public Diplomacy · Qualitative comparative analysis · Reputation · Scrutiny · Situational ethics · Transparency (behavior · Corporate Identity and Reputation · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Unpacking the halo effect
Organizational Transparency
Crises and Crisis Management
An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations
Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource
How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information
Communication and Attributions in a Crisis
Give the Emperor a Mirror
Agenda-setting Effects of Business News on the Public's Images and Opinions about Major Corporations
Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis
Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets
Choosing the Right Words
Vader
Being Good or Being Known
Image repair discourse and crisis communication
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Transparency for Participation through the Communication Approach
Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter
Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions
Is Apology the Best Policy? An Experimental Examination of the Effectiveness of Image Repair Strategies During Criminal and Noncriminal Athlete Transgressions
Surviving or thriving political defeat on social media
Make the Effort Visible
Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-set QCA on Sufficiency
Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Highly cited | No |
|---|