Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From “Bangtan Boys” to “International Relations Professor”

Mapping Self‐Identifications in the UN’s Twitter Public

Bibliographic Data

ID13054199
AuthorsLuis Aue (0000-0002-3445-2043, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Florian Börgel (0000-0003-3294-667X, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde)
Year2023
Volume11
Issue3
Pages120-133
Publication date2023-07-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics and Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-2463 • E-ISSN: 2183-2463
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/pag.v11i3.6769
OpenAlexW4383820996
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Digitalization and social media established world-encompassing publics that engage with international organizations. While scholarship has analyzed how international organizations communicate with such digital publics, this article determines who participates in these publics. We created a novel dataset to map the UN’s digital public on Twitter and analyzed the bios of 243,168 accounts that have interacted with the UN. Members of this public provide self-identifications (such as researcher, consultant, or scientist) that indicate a professional interest in the UN. We analyzed clusters of users that self-identify with similar words. We find high heterogeneity in the UN’s digital public: Clusters of professional, academic, and organizational users suggest that the technocratic history of international organizations reflects in the members of its digital public. At the same time, the digital public of the UN extends to very different groups (human rights activists and K-Pop fans feature in the UN’s public on Twitter). We demonstrate for future research how multiple correspondence analysis can reveal clusters in unstructured biographical data. The article contributes the first analysis of self-identifications in digital publics of global politics

Centrality · Digital scholarship · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Scholarship · Social media · Sociology · Technocracy · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Media and Politics

  • Publics in Global Politics

    Open Access•Janne Mendes, Thomas Müller et al.•Politics and Governance•2023

  • Share @WHO? Authority and Resonance in IO Social Media Communication

    Open Access•Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias Hofferberth•Global Studies Quarterly•2026

  • The Opening Up of International Organizations

    Open Access•Jonas Tallberg, Thomas Sommerer et al.•Opening up of International…•2013

  • Popular non-support for international organizations

    Open Access•David H Bearce, Brandy Jolliff Scott et al.•The Review of International…•2019

  • The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations

    Open Access•Jonas Tallberg, Michael Zürn•The Review of International…•2019

  • Self-legitimation in the face of politicization

    Open Access•Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt•The Review of International…•2018

  • The Authority Trap

    Sarah S Stroup, Wendy H Wong•Authority Trap•2018

  • A Bird’s Eye View

    Open Access•Sina F Özdemir, Christian Rauh•Politics and Governance•2022

  • Publics in Global Politics

    Open Access•Janne Mendes, Thomas Müller et al.•Politics and Governance•2023

  • Keeping Your Enemies Close? The Variety of Social Movements’ Reactions to International Organizations’ Opening Up

    Open Access•Felix Anderl, Priska Daphi et al.•International Studies Review•2021

  • Contracting development

    Leonard Seabrooke, Ole Jacob Sending•Review of International Political…•2019

  • The League of Nations’ Collaboration with an ‘International Public’, 1919–1939

    Open Access•Emil Eiby Seidenfaden•Contemporary European History•2022

  • The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions

    Open Access•Allen Buchanan, Robert O Keohane•Ethics & International Affairs•2006

  • Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas

    Open Access•Nicole Deitelhoff, Harald Müller•Review of International Studies•2005

  • Public Legitimation by “Going Personal”? The Ambiguous Role of International Organization Officials on Social Media

    Open Access•Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt•Politics and Governance•2023

  • International Pecking Orders

    Open Access•Vincent Pouliot•International Pecking Orders•2016

  • The Legitimacy of the People

    Open Access•Sofia Näsström•Political Theory•2007

  • No Longer Lost in Translation

    Open Access•Erik De Vries, Martijn Schoonvelde et al.•Political Analysis•2018

  • Mapping the Boundaries of Elite Cues

    Alexandra Guisinger, Elizabeth N Saunders•International Studies Quarterly•2017

  • International Organizations “Going Public”? An Event History Analysis of Public Communication Reforms 1950–2015

    Open Access•Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt•International Studies Quarterly•2018

  • The Discursive Process of Legalization

    Open Access•Nicole Deitelhoff•International Organization•2009

  • Challenges to the Liberal Order

    Open Access•David A Lake, Lisa L Martins et al.•International Organization•2021

  • Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere

    Open Access•Patrizia Nanz, Jens Steffek•Government and Opposition•2004

  • The Body of the Diplomat

    Open Access•Iver B Neumann•European Journal of International…•2008

  • Cosmopolitan politicization

    Open Access•Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt•European Journal of International…•2012

  • Revisiting ‘identity’ in International Relations

    Open Access•Bernd Bucher, Ursula Jasper•European Journal of International…•2017

  • The Legitimation of International Governance

    Open Access•Jens Steffek•European Journal of International…•2003

  • The Elite-Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy

    Open Access•Lisa Dellmuth, Jan Aart Scholte et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics

    Open Access•Ruth W Grant, Robert O Keohane•American Political Science Review•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae