From “Bangtan Boys” to “International Relations Professor”
Mapping Self‐Identifications in the UN’s Twitter Public
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13054199 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luis Aue (0000-0002-3445-2043, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Florian Börgel (0000-0003-3294-667X, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 120-133 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics and Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-2463 • E-ISSN: 2183-2463 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/pag.v11i3.6769 |
| OpenAlex | W4383820996 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 36 |
Digitalization and social media established world-encompassing publics that engage with international organizations. While scholarship has analyzed how international organizations communicate with such digital publics, this article determines who participates in these publics. We created a novel dataset to map the UN’s digital public on Twitter and analyzed the bios of 243,168 accounts that have interacted with the UN. Members of this public provide self-identifications (such as researcher, consultant, or scientist) that indicate a professional interest in the UN. We analyzed clusters of users that self-identify with similar words. We find high heterogeneity in the UN’s digital public: Clusters of professional, academic, and organizational users suggest that the technocratic history of international organizations reflects in the members of its digital public. At the same time, the digital public of the UN extends to very different groups (human rights activists and K-Pop fans feature in the UN’s public on Twitter). We demonstrate for future research how multiple correspondence analysis can reveal clusters in unstructured biographical data. The article contributes the first analysis of self-identifications in digital publics of global politics
Centrality · Digital scholarship · Library science · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Publics · Scholarship · Social media · Sociology · Technocracy · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Media and Politics
The Opening Up of International Organizations
Popular non-support for international organizations
The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations
Self-legitimation in the face of politicization
The Authority Trap
A Bird’s Eye View
Publics in Global Politics
Keeping Your Enemies Close? The Variety of Social Movements’ Reactions to International Organizations’ Opening Up
Contracting development
The League of Nations’ Collaboration with an ‘International Public’, 1919–1939
The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions
Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas
Public Legitimation by “Going Personal”? The Ambiguous Role of International Organization Officials on Social Media
International Pecking Orders
The Legitimacy of the People
No Longer Lost in Translation
Mapping the Boundaries of Elite Cues
International Organizations “Going Public”? An Event History Analysis of Public Communication Reforms 1950–2015
The Discursive Process of Legalization
Challenges to the Liberal Order
Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere
The Body of the Diplomat
Cosmopolitan politicization
Revisiting ‘identity’ in International Relations
The Legitimation of International Governance
The Elite-Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy
Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |