Reforming the Reception and Inclusion of Refugees in the European Union
Utopian or Dystopian Changes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13054854 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Encarnación La Spina (0000-0003-0423-0674, Universidad de Deusto, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Inclusion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-2803 • E-ISSN: 2183-2803 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/si.v10i3.5222 |
| OpenAlex | W4283271063 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
The provision of high‐quality reception conditions and the effective inclusion of refugees are permanent challenges in the implementation of the European asylum agenda. The EU legal framework for the reception of refugees has evolved over time through various legislative reforms, notably including those launched in 2016 and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum proposed in 2020. The European Union has also tried to reinforce its non‐binding integration policy with the adoption of the Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion 2021–2027. While this plan is intended to promote an alternative “social resilient” integration model for refugees that emulates community sponsorship in Europe, it also generates great bottom‐up expectations to provide better integration. These legislative reform proposals and their programmatic framework are theoretically intended to consolidate the European reception and integration system, but in practice have increased the dichotomous tension between utopia and dystopia. Drawing on a political interpretation of both concepts, this article critically analyses the real nature of the changes proposed in the legislative CEAS reforms and in the action plans. Both visions are useful to evaluate the desirability, viability, and achievability of these transformative changes in the future asylum system
Action plan · Dystopia · Economics · European integration · European union · Inclusion (mineral · International trade · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Social science · Sociology · Utopia · Vision · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Public Administration
The Ethics of Citizen Selection of Refugees for Admission and Resettlement
Performativity, precarity, and Sexual Policies
Migration and Resilience in Urban Canada
Especially Vulnerable Subjects and Categories in the Context of European Migration
Integration Measures within the Reform of the Common European Asylum System
Covid-19, Asylum in the EU, and the Great Expectations of Solidarity
Hospitality and Sovereignty
Refugee Reception within a common European asylum system
Sustaining the Private Sponsorship of Resettled Refugees in Canada
Community Sponsorship in Europe
Mare nostrum
Against ‘immigrant integration’
Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’
Utopian in the Right Sense”
The political vision of Europe during the ‘refugee crisis’
Towards a parallel exceptional welfare system
Resilience and justice
Private Sponsorship
What Role Does Type of Sponsorship Play in Early Integration Outcomes? Syrian Refugees Resettled in Six Canadian Cities
Part Iii
Complementary Pathways to Protection
The long-term economic integration of resettled refugees in Canada
Blending, Bargaining, and Burden-Sharing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |