Bulgarian Foster Parents and Money
Strategies, Identity Work, and Relations With the Child
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13055613 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Radostina Antonova (0000-0002-8417-204X, New Bulgarian University, corresponding author), Gergana Nenova (0000-0002-2053-3774, Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski") |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Inclusion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-2803 • E-ISSN: 2183-2803 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/si.10616 |
| OpenAlex | W4414296356 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Recent research indicates that the cost of residential care per child in Central and Eastern Europe is three to five times higher than that of foster care (UNICEF, 2024). Short‐term foster care requires an intensive initial investment, but it reduces the number of children staying for longer periods in state care and prevents longer‐term family separation. In Bulgaria, where foster care is a relatively new and loosely institutionalised phenomenon, foster parents face not only considerable structural difficulties (insecure financing, low state support, etc.) but also public accusations of using foster care children for their financial benefit. Media and popular opinion frequently describe foster parents as “treating children as ATMs.” The negative cultural image of foster parents is reinforced by the widespread distrust in child protection services, which leads to accusations that children are taken away from their biological parents so that they can provide “material” and legitimacy for the existence of foster care. The present article has two interrelated aims: first, to examine the strategies by which foster parents navigate their precarious social situation. Based on in‐depth interviews with foster parents, we observe the “identity work” of foster parents, i.e., how they reconstruct their identities in response to negative public messages and institutional constraints. Second, we aim to examine the obstacles foster parents encounter in establishing and sustaining focused, meaningful relationships with the child, and how financial issues may impede this process
Bulgarian · Distrust · Face (sociological concept · Foster care · Foster parents · Identity (music · State (computer science · Child Welfare and Adoption · Family Support in Illness · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Identities and Identity Work in Organizations
The neurobiology of childhood trauma and abuse
Thematic Analysis
The Adequacy of Foster Care Allowances
Current trends, figures and challenges in out of home child care
The challenge of reforming child protection in Eastern Europe
Being a Foster Family in Portugal—Motivations and Experiences
Australian foster carers’ negotiations of intimacy with agency workers, birth families and children
Developing and Maintaining Foster Family Identity Through Foster Parents’ Identity Work
Towards a theory of upbringing in foster care in Europe
Professional foster carer and committed parent
Caring for the Child, Caring for the Family
The Professionalisation of Foster Care
Public perception of the foster care system
From Attachment to Recognition for Children in Care
The "Discovery" of Child Abuse
Managing Managerial Identities
Heuristic Inquiry
Foster Care Beyond the Crossroads
Sociological Ambivalence
Somebody's Children or Nobody's Children? How the Sociological Perspective Could Enliven Research on Foster Care
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |