Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The safety of bycatch

South Korean responses to the moratorium on commercial whaling

Bibliographic Data

ID13061785
AuthorsBradley Tatar (0000-0003-4282-4297, Korea University of Science and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume3
Issue2
Pages89-97
Publication date2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Marine and Island Cultures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2212-6821 • E-ISSN: 2212-6821
PublisherShima Publishing (PUBLISHER • AU)
DOI10.1016/j.imic.2014.08.002
OpenAlexW2072173268
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

When the global moratorium on commercial whaling was implemented in 1986, Korea prohibited whaling; however, there was no effort to build the capacity of social institutions to guide local residents to cooperate with the policy. Utilizing a social ecology approach, this research examines the practice of eating whale meat in Ulsan, South Korea, to illustrate the importance of culture for attaining the social acceptance of wildlife conservation policy. The cultural models which influence the consumption of whale meat are here classified as representing four distinct responses to the moratorium: opposition, resistance, evasion and support. The two most important changes are the public utilization of whale meat as a symbol of an endangered culture, and the reliance on meat procured legally from accidental entanglements of whales in fishing nets (cetacean bycatch). These cultural changes have a social function, which is to impart legitimacy and acceptance to the continued consumption of whale meat, from illegal as well as legal sources. Given the cultural acceptance of whale meat, I argue that it will not be possible to eradicate the illegal market through enforcement alone. Instead, the solution is to persuade local consumers of whale meat to cooperate with the moratorium

Biology · Business · Bycatch · Enforcement · Fishery · Fishing · Legitimacy · Political science · Right whale · Whale · Whaling · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law

  • Whaling in Korea

    Open Access•Bradley Tatar•Power and Protest•2021

  • Politics of technology in the informal governance of destructive fishing in Spermonde, Indonesia

    Open Access•Adam Grydehøj, Nurliah Nurdin•GeoJournal•2015

  • The Challenge of Common-Pool Resources

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Environment Science and Policy…•2008

  • International Principles For Social Impact Assessment

    Frank Vanclay•Impact Assessment and Project…•2003

  • A Cultural Model Assessment of Oyster Restoration Alternatives for the Chesapeake Bay

    M Paolisso, Nicole Dery•Human Organization•2010

  • Contesting Global Norms

    Anders Blok•Global Environmental Politics•2008

  • The Importance of Context

    Raul P Lejano, Herbert Ingram et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2007

  • Reinventing a Square Wheel

    Peter R Wilshusen, Steven R Brechin et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2002

  • Life on the Water

    Open Access•Ben G Blount•NAPA Bulletin•2007

  • Prayers for the Whales

    Kumi Kato•International Journal of Cultural…•2007

  • Institutional Failure in Resource Management

    James Acheson, James M Acheson•Annual Review of Anthropology•2006

  • Cetacean By-Catch in the Korean Peninsula-by Chance or by Design

    Open Access•Douglas C Macmillan, Jeonghee Han et al.•Human Ecology•2011

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,18
Citation span2015 - 2021 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae