Connecting the Right of Collective Legal Capacity by Indigenous Peoples with the Right of Individual Legal Capacity by Persons with Disabilities

This Article explores the juridical implications of indigenous peoples’ right to legal capacity in the Inter-American system for cases involving the same right of persons with disabilities within that system and beyond. It explicates the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ (IACtHR) three-factor test in Saramaka People v Suriname and analogizes its reasoning with rationales underpinning the right to legal capacity under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( crpd ). It then demonstrates how the IACtHR can apply a Saramaka -style test to future cases brought by persons with disabilities challenging legal capacity restrictions. The Article further argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) should also apply this rule to align its legal capacity jurisprudence with the crpd ’s mandates. Finally, it suggests that the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( crpd Committee) ought to consider this rule when resolving individual communications and thereby guide courts

Convention · Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities · Human rights · Indigenous · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Test (biology · Underpinning · Engineering · Human Rights and Development · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

• More Than Meets the Eye

  Open Access•Eniola Salami, Bonnie Lashewicz et al.•Windsor Yearbook of Access to…•2015

  Add to list