Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Religious-Only Marriages in the UK

Bibliographic Data

ID13062207
AuthorsRehana Parveen (0000-0003-2461-1300, University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume6
Issue3
Pages316-337
Publication date2018-09-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology of Islam (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2213-140X • E-ISSN: 2213-1418
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/22131418-00603004
OpenAlexW2895307726
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Non-state-registered Muslim marriages are often considered as a poor alternative to civil marriage, accepted by vulnerable or ill-informed Muslim women. Problematizing such marriages is based on the assumption that entering into a civil marriage (in addition to or as an alternative to the Muslim marriage) is beneficial for all Muslim women. Listening to the narratives of the women concerned reveals a wide range of opinions, including those that prefer to enter into religious-only marriages. Solutions to the problems presented by unregistered religious-only marriages have thus far been proposed in a manner that reflects a discourse that considers unregistered marriages as somehow conceptually problematic. However, in so far as English law is concerned, the legal position of Muslims who enter into non-state-registered marriages is no different from that of cohabitees, who live together without the ‘protection’ of a civil marriage. Therefore, it may be worth considering whether the issue at stake is reconsidering family law and laws concerning cohabitation, rather than a separate set of rules and regulations for Muslims

Cohabitation · Family law · Islam · Marriage law · Narrative · Political science · Religious Law · Sociology · State (computer science · Gender and Women's Rights · Gender Studies · History · Law · Marriage and Family Dynamics · Marriage and Sexual Relationships

  • Between God and Government

    Open Access•X Niu, Karen A Joe Laidler•Feminist Legal Studies•2024

  • Relative, Relational, and Affective

    Open Access•Gulseren Kozak-Isik•Social & Legal Studies•2025

  • Daʿwa is Our Identity’—Salafism and IslamNet’s Rationales for Action in a Norwegian Context

    Bangstad, Marius Linge•Journal of Muslims in Europe•2015

  • Muslim marriage (non) recognition

    Kathryn O’sullivan, Leyla Jackson•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2017

  • Muslim Families, Politics and the Law

    Leyla Jackson•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2016

  • Choice, Culture and the Politics of Belonging

    Open Access•Máiréad Enright•Modern Law Review•2009

  • Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21 st Century Britain

    Open Access•Anne Barlow, Grace James•Modern Law Review•2004

  • Modernising the other

    Aisha K Gill, Aisha Gill et al.•Policy & Politics•2012

  • The moral maze

    Open Access•Martijn De Koning•Contemporary Islam•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae