Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessing Indigenous Forms of Writing

Bibliographic Data

ID13062437
AuthorsAna Carolina Hosne (0009-0008-4885-6672, Gerda Henkel Foundation, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume1
Issue2
Pages177-191
Publication date2014-02-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Jesuit Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-1324 • E-ISSN: 2214-1332
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/22141332-00102002
OpenAlexW9207241
LanguageEN
References cited2

In this article, the Jesuit José de Acosta’s interest in Andean quipus is analyzed as it evolved throughout his works, beginning in the preface of De procuranda indorum salute (1588) and reaching a point of arrival in his Historia natural y moral de las Indias (1590). In De procuranda , Acosta established different categories of “barbaric nations,” placing the Indians from Mexico and Peru after the Chinese and Japanese. The latter belonged to the first category of “barbaric nations” because of their judgement, a stable republic, laws, fortified cities, and—most importantly in Acosta’s eyes—use and knowledge of letters. In the Historia Acosta resumed aspects of this classification, with a focus on letters—or the lack of them—and writing, bringing China to the forefront. The difference with De procuranda was that Acosta’s Historia fed on fresh information from the first Jesuits to establish a mission in China, Michele Ruggieri (1543–1607) and Matteo Ricci (1552–1640), which invigorated Acosta’s analysis of letters, writing, and all that in his view could not be considered “letters” or “writing.” In the first section of this article, Acosta’s views on Andean quipus are analyzed, based mainly on his experience in the Peru mission. In the second section, focus shifts to Acosta’s analysis of letters and writing, especially in his Historia , in which China played a preeminent role, bringing out interesting points of comparison with the Andean quipus . In the conclusion, are reflections on Acosta’s own view of indigenous forms of writing in contrast with alphabetic script

China · Humanities · Indigenous · Judgement · Political science · Section (typography · Theology · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Latin American history and culture · Law · Philosophy

  • Queequeg's Coffin

    Gordon M Sayre•Journal of American History•2012

  • The Making of an Enterprise

    Dauril Alden•The Making of an Enterprise•1996

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae