Examining migration governance
Evidence of rising insecurities due to Covid-19 in China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailand
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13063622 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asel Murzakulova (0000-0001-5819-2285, University of Central Asia, corresponding author), Mengistu Dessalegn (International Water Management Institute), Neelambari Phalkey (0000-0002-2620-3549, University of Birmingham) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 44-44 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Migration Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-594X • E-ISSN: 2214-8590 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s40878-021-00254-0 |
| PMID | 34631431 |
| OpenAlex | W3203895689 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 16 |
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the context of global migration. From a migration perspective, the pandemic is a source of insecurities that challenge migrants, their livelihoods and migration governance. Meanwhile, curtailment in movement has led to economic decline affecting labour markets. For migrant origin and hosting countries, this poses multidimensional development challenges. Analysis from March to August 2020 of China, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Morocco, Nepal and Thailand highlights the varying ways in which they are all severely affected by the disruptions in migration, suggesting a potentially emerging complex situation in migration patterns and pathways. The disruptions in migration and remittances have had a profound impact on migrants and migrant-sending households. The uncertainty of migration returning to pre-pandemic levels and the potential of lasting consequences on migrants and migration patterns and pathways, suggests a future of greater risk and exploitation, and a wider gap between formal and informal migration. This paper calls for greater mobility cooperation between countries and suggests strengthening mobility migration frameworks and policies for safer migration and for the rights of migrants
Agriculture · Business · China · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Corporate governance · Development economics · Economic geography · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Human migration · Livelihood · Pandemic · Political science · Population · Sociology · Urbanization · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
“Covid refugees” in Taiwan
Return Migration, Crime, and Conflict in Rural Thailand
From scenario to mounting risks
Covid-19 pandemic and the changing views of mobility
Rethinking the migration-development nexus in the post-Covid-19 era
Transnational guest workers in the 21st century
What Happens When Borders Reopen? Dematerialising the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Boundary
Unpacking youth engagement in agriculture
Covid-19 outbreak
Migration Systems, Pioneer Migrants and the Role of Agency
Remittance Markets in Africa
Unequal pain
Who loses income during the Covid-19 outbreak? Evidence from China
Networks, Linkages, and Migration Systems
China's employment stabilization policies in response to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic
Some Reflections on Structure and Agency in Migration Theory
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |