Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

In the green? Perceptions of hydrogen production methods among the Norwegian public

Bibliographic Data

ID13064529
AuthorsHenrik L Bentsen (0000-0002-4262-612X, NORCE Research AS, corresponding author), Jon Kåre Skiple (0000-0002-4810-5042, NORCE Research AS), Thea Gregersen (0000-0001-5797-1850, University of Bergen), Efthymia Derempouka (University of Bergen), Trygve Skjold (0000-0002-4577-4611, University of Bergen)
Year2023
Volume97
Pages102985-102985
Publication date2023-02-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2023.102985
OpenAlexW4320516652
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited42

This article presents findings from a representative survey, fielded through the Norwegian Citizen Panel, examining public perceptions of hydrogen fuel and its different production methods. Although several countries, including Norway, have strategies to increase the production of hydrogen fuel, our results indicate that hydrogen as an energy carrier, and its different production methods, are still unknown to a large part of the public. A common misunderstanding seems to be confusing ‘hydrogen fuel’ in general with environmentally friendly ‘green hydrogen’. Results from a survey experiment (N = 1906) show that production method is important for public acceptance. On a five-point acceptance scale, respondents score on average 3.9 for ‘green’ hydrogen, which is produced from renewable energy sources. The level of acceptance is significantly lower for ‘blue’ (3.2) and ‘grey’ (2.3) hydrogen when respondents are informed that these are produced from coal, oil, or natural gas. Public support for hydrogen fuel in general, as well as the different production methods, is also related to their level of worry about climate change, gender, and political affiliation. Widespread misunderstandings regarding ‘green’ hydrogen production could potentially fuel public resistance as new ‘blue’ or ‘grey’ projects develop. Our results indicate a need for clearer communication from the government and developers regarding production methods to avoid distrust and potential public backfire

Economics · Hydrogen · Hydrogen production · Microeconomics · Norwegian · Perception · Production (economics · Chemistry · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Science · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Organic Chemistry

  • Hydrogen and biofuel synergies in the transport sector

    Open Access•Dominik Franczak, Martin Černek et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Stakeholders’ perceptions of hydrogen and reflections on energy transition governance

    Open Access•Cristina Parente, Francisca Teixeira et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2024

  • Cross-national examination of facilitators and hindrances to the public acceptance of hydrogen refuelling facilities

    Open Access•Ning Huan, Toshiyuki Yamamoto et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Experts’ Perceptions on Barriers and Incentives to Green Hydrogen Adoption

    Open Access•Elena Ocenic, Mihai Sandu•Societies•2026

  • Addressing “the ones behind”

    Open Access•Dirk Scheer, Marco Sonnberger•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Cruel utopia of the seas? Multiple risks challenge the singular hydrogen hype in Finnish maritime logistics

    Open Access•Nina Janasik, Emilia Luoma et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • From vision to reality

    Open Access•Joaquin Navajas, Eulàlia Badia et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Does time matter? A multi-level assessment of delayed energy transitions and hydrogen pathways in Norway

    Open Access•Claudia Siew Wan Cheng•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Exploring the nexus of gender and energy transitions

    Open Access•Marco Cellini, Sabine Loos et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Climate worry, higher education, or both? Exploring the motivations behind hydrogen optimism in Norway

    Open Access•Efthymia Derempouka, Trygve Skjold et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Does the public want green hydrogen in industry? Local and national acceptance of methanol and steel transitions in Germany

    Open Access•Sven Alsheimer•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Palm trees, energy security and green hydrogen futures

    Open Access•Noreen Brennan, Thomas M Van Rensburg•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Shades of Hydrogen

    Open Access•Philipp Weisenburger•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy

    Open Access•Judith I M De Groot, Linda Steg et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Jeffrey B Jacquet, Jeffrey Jacquet•Energy Policy•2012

  • The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern

    Open Access•M Cruz, Shannon M Cruz•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2017

  • Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS)

    Open Access•Selma L’Orange Seigo, Selma L׳Orange Seigo et al.•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2014

  • Public opinion on energy development

    Open Access•Christopher E Clarke, P Sol Hart et al.•Energy Policy•2015

  • Inference and missing data

    Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1976

  • An exploratory study of public opinions on the use of hydrogen energy in Wales

    Open Access•S J Cherryman, Samantha Cherryman et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2008

  • Public Acceptance of Hydrogen in the Netherlands

    Open Access•J Leslie Zachariah-Wolff, K Hemmes•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2006

  • Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Toby Bolsen•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Goldberg, Abel Gustafson et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2020

  • Mixed feelings on wind energy

    Open Access•Julia Cousse, Rolf Wüstenhagen et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research

    Open Access•Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • A hybrid perspective on energy transition pathways

    Open Access•Sigrid Damman, Eli Sandberg et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

Unique citing works13
Citations per year4,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae