Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Participatory repertoires for aligning policy and society

An analysis of Dutch stakeholder views on deep geothermal energy

Bibliographic Data

ID13066112
AuthorsTamara Metze (0000-0002-6103-5958, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Jos Van Den Broek (0000-0001-9754-1206), Rinie van Est (0000-0002-3990-3042, Rathenau Instituut), Eefje Cuppen (0000-0002-0400-9542, Leiden University)
Year2023
Volume98
Pages103019-103019
Publication date2023-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2023.103019
OpenAlexW4327630636
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited46

In a transition to a sustainable energy system, governmental actors initiate participatory processes to gain better insights in questions and concerns of stakeholders, or to create support for decisions. Those participatory activities are embedded in institutionalized and formal decision making procedures. Participatory approaches promise to function as alignment mechanisms between those policies and society. The aim of this paper is to contribute to more successful alignment mechanisms. Based on a thematic analysis of 18 interviews and approximately one hundred policy documents, we relate stakeholders' uncertainties about ultra-deep geothermal energy to their preferred modes of participation. These stakeholders were (in)directly involved in the Dutch Green Deal program, in this case the Green Deal Geothermal Energy in the province North Brabant. Based on the analysis, we identify four participatory storylines and develop a more systemic view on different participatory activities: ‘participatory repertoires’. We conclude that unproductive power-politics between different political-administrative levels, and emerging local and wider publics that hamper alignments, may be prevented. This can be done by prioritizing societal dialogue on normative uncertainties in a range of combinations with local dialogue on normative, conceptual uncertainties, and with national or local joint fact finding on informational uncertainties

Citizen journalism · Normative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Thematic analysis · Law · Risk Perception and Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Public participation GIS scenarios for decision-making on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems

    Open Access•Christine Rösch, Elham Fakharizadehshirazi•Energy Sustainability and Society•2025

  • Smallholder women rising

    Open Access•Hayriye Özen•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Beyond Innovation Niches

    Open Access•Philippe Hamman, Patricia Schneider et al.•Societies•2025

  • Value-sensitive design under ground? Exploring the community-based monitoring of a geothermal project in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Michael Duijn, Jitske Van Popering‐verkerk et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Strategies for Indonesia's low carbon energy transition based on a participatory energy system dynamic model

    Open Access•Ariana Soemanto, Ervan Mohi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Responsible mission governance

    Open Access•Martijn Wiarda, M J Janssen et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2024

  • A Ladder of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Planning…•2019

  • Coping with intractable controversies

    Open Access•Matthijs Hisschemöller, Rob Hoppe•Knowledge, technology &…•1995

  • Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes

    Noel Cass, Gordon Walker et al.•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2010

  • Narratives, Rhetorical Genres, and Environmental Conflict

    William J Kinsella, Peter K Bsumek et al.•Environmental Communication•2008

  • Fuel to the fire

    Open Access•Tamara Metze•The Extractive Industries and…•2018

  • Elusive publics in energy projects

    Open Access•Udo Pesch•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • From consultation toward co-production in science and policy

    Open Access•Ester Galende-Sánchez, Alevgul H Sorman•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Neither risky technology nor renewable electricity

    Open Access•Christina Benighaus, Alena Bleicher•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Co-production in the wind energy sector

    Open Access•Helena Solman, M C J Smits et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • The more public influence, the better? The effects of full versus shared influence on public acceptability of energy projects in the Netherlands and China

    Open Access•Lu Liu, Thijs Bouman et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States

    Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects

    Open Access•Eefje Cuppen•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Public agency and responsibility in energy governance

    Open Access•T S G H Rodhouse, Udo Pesch et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Energy citizenship in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Isa Beauchampet, Bríd Walsh•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • When controversies cascade

    Open Access•Eefje Cuppen, Olivier Ejderyan et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept

    Open Access•Catrien J A M Termeer, Cjam Termeer et al.•Policy and Society•2019

  • Designing Public Participation Processes

    Open Access•John M Bryson, Kathy Quick et al.•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums

    Open Access•Carolyn M Hendriks•Policy Sciences•2005

  • Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change

    Open Access•Gordon Walker, Noel Ca et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2010

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Participation in Transition(s)

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Noel Longhurst•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2016

  • Understanding governmental activism

    Open Access•Imrat Verhoeven, Jan Willem Duyvendak•Social movement studies•2017

  • Comparing policy conflict on electricity transmission line sitings

    Open Access•J You, Jill Yordy et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2023

  • Responsible research and innovation

    Roger Owens, R Owen et al.•Science and Public Policy•2012

  • Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers, Matthew Kearnes•Science Technology & Human Values•2020

  • Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance

    Open Access•Anna Wesselink, Jouni Paavola et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2011

  • Institutions

    Open Access•Douglass C North•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • An Essay on Framing and Overflowing

    Open Access•Michel Callon•The Sociological Review•1998

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae