Is energy efficiency just? Examining social equity in residential demand response programs in Texas

Bibliographic Data

ID13066754
AuthorsAlexis Phelps (The University of Texas Health Science Center), Kevin Lanza (0000-0002-5259-6745, The University of Texas Health Science Center, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume127
Pages104173-104173
Publication date2025-06-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2025.104173
OpenAlexW4411394399
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited46

Extreme heat and other weather-related hazards increase the risk of power outages and their associated health threat. Residential demand response (RDR) programs—incentive-based initiatives from energy providers that customers can opt into that allow providers to change their electricity usage in response to conditions—can improve electric grid resilience; however, little is known about the fairness of these programs across populations. In this qualitative study, we explored the barriers to participation in RDR programs by low-income households in the United States and how, if at all, program providers consider equity in the design of RDR programs and in what ways that can impact customer participation. Between January–May 2024, we conducted qualitative interviews with energy providers and regulators in Texas ( n = 22) and subject matter experts in energy policy nationwide ( n = 5). We identified six themes using NVivo: 1) equity is often overlooked in program design; 2) programs do not benefit everyone equally; 3) programs may be harmful for certain groups; 4) poor communication is a barrier to program participation; 5) mistrust in energy providers is a barrier to program participation; and 6) tenants face unique challenges in adopting programs. With climate change expected to increase extreme weather events and the threat to energy infrastructure and health, energy providers should consider partnering with energy-burdened households to design RDR programs that benefit both these households and ultimately all residents across energy provider service regions. • Equity not priority in RDR program design and mixed opinion if programs are ethical • Housing quality may make RDR programs dangerous for certain households • Limited communication of health risks of RDR programs by energy providers • Mistrust in energy providers due to more blackouts in minoritized communities • Renters have more barriers to RDR program participation compared to homeowners

Business · Demand response · Economics · Environmental economics · Equity (law · Natural resource economics · Political science · Public economics · Social equality · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Homelessness and Social Issues · Smart Grid Energy Management

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access