Adapting to limited grid capacity
Perceptions of injustice emerging from grid congestion in the Netherlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13067756 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eva de Winkel (Delft University of Technology, corresponding author), Zofia Lukszo (0000-0002-6643-3699, Delft University of Technology), Mark Neerincx (Delft University of Technology), Roel Dobbe (0000-0003-4633-7023, Delft University of Technology) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 122 |
| Pages | 103962-103962 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2025.103962 |
| OpenAlex | W4407680927 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 42 |
As renewable energy and electrification expand rapidly, many electrical distribution grids experience grid congestion . This situation leads to long waiting lists for parties seeking a new grid connection or aiming to expand their existing grid connection. In addition to traditional grid enforcements, distribution system operators are developing ways to manage congestion by steering electricity supply and demand. As grid congestion limits the previously abundant resource of grid capacity, the challenge of how to fairly distribute this now-scarce resource raises new questions about nondiscrimination and broader notions of justice. This study, grounded in energy justice, explores the distributive and procedural injustices people experience with increasing grid congestion. Our research focuses on The Netherlands, where more than 10,000 parties await new grid connections. Through 16 semi-structured interviews with people either affected by or involved in mitigating grid congestion, our thematic analysis reveals three key categories: (1) injustices arising from legacy policies, legislation, and social norms; (2) injustices due to unclear regulations, inconsistent policies, and policy gaps; and (3) injustices related to changing relationships between DSOs and affected parties. These findings highlight that grid congestion is fundamentally sociotechnical ; while congestion is both constrained and addressed by technical factors, institutional and social factors such as legacy policies, social norms and communication, significantly influence perceptions of injustice. Our findings call for a comprehensive integration of justice principles within the institutional (e.g. regulation, policy, markets, social norms), technical (e.g. grid infrastructure, IT systems), and social (e.g. community engagement, communication) components of grid infrastructure. • Electrical distribution grid congestion aggravates energy justice challenges. • Stakeholders experience distributive and procedural injustices in the Netherlands. • Most injustices stem from legacy regulations, social norms, and policy ambiguity. • Perceived injustices are also influenced by changing DSO–customer relationships. • Calls for approaching grid congestion as a sociotechnical problem
Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Geography · Grid · Injustice · Perception · Computer Science · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Psychology · Smart Grid Energy Management · Social Psychology · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Electricity grid and societal vulnerability interconnection
A GIS Milp framework for electric vehicle charging station placement and optimization
Changing the rules of the game to encourage a collaborative arrangement
From charging bottlenecks to resilient cities
The power of assumptions
Integrating spatial planning and energy policy in The Netherlands
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Energy justice
Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems
Systematic methodological review
Competing socio-technical narratives in times of grid capacity challenges
Shifting patterns – The patterned enactments of flexible electricity consumption by Norwegian households
Conceptualizations of smart grids –anomalous and contradictory expert paradigms in transitions of the electricity system
Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy
Including young people, cutting time and producing useful outcomes
(No) room for time-shifting energy use
Beyond Decide-Announce-Defend (DAD) and Not-in-My-Backyard (Nimby) models? Addressing the social and public acceptance of electric transmission lines in Germany
Revisiting recognition in energy justice
Beyond technical smartness
Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems
Overlooked, misunderstood, or sidelined
Energy justice beyond the wire
Assessing elements of energy justice in Colombia
Distributive energy justice
Problematising energy justice
Misalignments of theory and practice
Socially smart grids? A multi-criteria mapping of diverse stakeholder perspectives on smart energy futures in the United Kingdom
Congestion management in electricity distribution networks
Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK
Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Implementing transition management as policy reforms
Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |