Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Critically assessing and projecting the frequency, severity, and cost of major energy accidents

Bibliographic Data

ID13068416
AuthorsJinsoo Kim (0000-0001-6496-1714, University of Sussex, corresponding author), Donghoon Ryu (University of Sussex), B K Sovacool (0000-0002-4794-9403, University of Sussex)
Year2021
Volume8
Issue2
Pages100885-100885
Publication date2021-02-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Extractive Industries and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-790X • E-ISSN: 2214-7918
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.exis.2021.02.005
OpenAlexW3133483489
LanguageEN
References cited24

Although energy systems are well known to lead to positive or negative externalities, one less explored attribute has been a rigorous historical and future looking assessment of energy accidents. In this study, we analyze an extensive dataset of 4,450 energy accidents from 1800 to 2018 across eleven energy systems. Our analysis reveals that these collective energy systems resulted in more than 278,000 human fatalities and approximately $421.3 billion in economic damages. Historically, coal accidents are the most frequent, accounting for almost half of all accidents. In terms of severity, accidents at hydroelectric dams were the most fatal, accounting for 67 percent. In terms of cost, nuclear power accidents are by far the most expensive, accounting for 62 percent of damages. Coupling our data and an econometric model with future projections of energy demand underscores the magnitude of the trends identified: 986,000 to 1.72 million potential energy accident deaths in 2040, as well as almost $1 trillion in damages. This leads to compelling policy implications, especially concerning the need for safety improvements in energy systems such as bioenergy and nuclear power, as well as the need for the IEA and IRENA, among others, to begin to better track and account for energy accident trends. We find that across all accidents, fuel extraction and processing, transmission and distribution, and transportation have the most fatalities, and yet conversion and operation, transmission and distribution, and transportation have the most damages. Moreover, achieving strong climate goals leads to an unacceptably higher risk of accidents and human health and economic consequences. Finally, as its economic development propels increases in energy consumption, Africa will become the future center for energy accident fatalities

Business · Energy (signal processing · Physics · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology · Risk and Safety Analysis

  • Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects

    Bent Flyvbjerg, Mette Skamris Holm et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2002

  • Reassessing the safety of nuclear power

    Open Access•Spencer Wheatley, B K Sovacool et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • An international comparative assessment of construction cost overruns for electricity infrastructure

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, Alexander Q Gilbert et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae