When TikTok Discovered the Human Remains Trade
A Case Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13077528 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shawn Graham (0000-0002-2887-3554, Carleton University, corresponding author), Damien Huffer (0000-0003-4027-1772, Carleton University), Jaime Simons (0000-0002-3428-2849, Carleton University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 196-219 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Open Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2300-6560 • E-ISSN: 2300-6560 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter Open (PUBLISHER • PL) |
| DOI | 10.1515/opar-2022-0235 |
| OpenAlex | W4226419858 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 26 |
In the summer of 2021, a video on TikTok was heavily reposted across a variety of social media platforms (attracting conventional media attention too). Unusually (for TikTok), it was about the trade in human remains. Thus, we were presented with the opportunity to watch how knowledge of the trade exploded into broader public consciousness on a comparatively newer platform. In this article, we scrape TikTok for reactions to that moment. In our previous research on the human remains trade on Instagram, we used a particular suite of digital humanities methods to understand how Instagram was being used by participants in the trade. Here, we employ those same methods to develop a case study for contrast. The original individual, whose TikTok account is used to promote his bricks-and-mortar business buying and selling human remains, has, as a result of this attention, gained an even greater number of followers and views, making the video a “success.” Nevertheless, several users engaged in long discussions in the comments concerning the ethics of what this individual is doing. A number of users created videos to criticize his activities, discussing the moral, ethical, and legal issues surrounding the trade in human remains, which in many ways makes the “success” of this video one of fostering opposition and a wider understanding of the ethical and moral issues around this trade
Advertising · Business · Consciousness · Epistemology · Opposition (politics · Political science · Social media · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy · Psychology
The real mummy’s curse
To Sell or Not to Sell
A Protocol for When Social Media Goes Private
Behind Closed Doors
Buy One Get One
To Replicate, or Not to Replicate? The Creation, Use, and Dissemination of 3D Models of Human Remains
Reputation laundering and museum collections
Which ideas do we get from war museums? A computational text analysis of the museums of the Battle of the Ebro (Spanish Civil War)
Tiktok’s Peer Pedagogies - Learning About Books Through #Booktok Videos
Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin)
Exploring Big Historical Data
Assemblages of the Dead
Ethical Challenges in Digital Public Archaeology
Digital Archaeological Ethics
Towards a Method for Discerning Sources of Supply within the Human Remains Trade via Patterns of Visual Dissimilarity and Computer Vision
Fleshing Out the Bones
Using Social Media as a Source for Understanding Public Perceptions of Archaeology
Towards a Digital Sensorial Archaeology as an Experiment in Distant Viewing of the Trade in Human Remains on Instagram
Determining the population affinity of an unprovenienced human skull for repatriation
Curating Archaeological Knowledgein the Digital Continuum
Reproducibility, Replicability, and Revisiting the Insta-Dead and the Human Remains Trade
The Insta-Dead
Research Note
Critical Questions for Big Data
Recently identified features that help to distinguish ceremonial tsantsa from commercial shrunken heads
The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |