Arendt’s Judgement and Eichmann’s Evil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13079527 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Mertens (0000-0002-4944-3182, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 58-89 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Redescriptions Political Thought Conceptual History and Feminist Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2308-0906 • E-ISSN: 2308-0914 |
| Publisher | Helsinki University Press (PUBLISHER • FI) |
| DOI | 10.7227/r.2.1.4 |
| OpenAlex | W2326758507 |
| Language | DE |
| References cited | 6 |
Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory is an international refereed open access journal, which publishes contributions on the transdisciplinary study of concepts. In classical rhetoric, ‘redescription’ refers to a rhetorical move that alters the use of a concept in one respect or another. The journal draws attention to conceptual moves within political theory, conceptual history and feminist thought, and highlights political agency within these moves. Political and feminist thought in various forms, whether in philosophical, historical or contemporary terms, is published by the journal. Unique in its focus in political and conceptual contingency, Redescriptions has been published since 1997. Redescriptions welcomes original scholarly contributions on any aspect of political and feminist thought, especially studies that take the changing and contested character of concepts seriously.All our previously published issues are freely available in our issue archive
Agency (philosophy · Character (mathematics · Conceptual history · Contingency · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Judgement · Linguistics · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |