The United States, Europe, and the Global Compacts

Honoring the Right to Remain and the Right to Migrate

Bibliographic Data

ID13089574
AuthorsJ Kevin Appleby (Center for Migration Studies of New York, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume13
Issue1
Pages151-167
Publication date2024-12-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal on Migration and Human Security (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2330-2488 • E-ISSN: 2331-5024
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23315024241306416
OpenAlexW4405511273
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

Executive Summary The adoption of the Global Compacts on Migration and Refugees in 2019 by the UN General Assembly marked a significant achievement, providing two essential frameworks from which UN Member States could fashion their future immigration and refugee policies. Since their adoption, however, the number of forcibly displaced in the world has increased significantly, prompting receiving nations, such as the United States and the European countries, to rely more on deterrence-based enforcement initiatives to reduce the number of migrants arriving at their borders. At the same time, the number of migrant deaths, both on sea and land, have increased, as desperate migrants, asylum-seekers, and refugees have attempted to find new homes in industrialized nations. This paper analyzes the migration policies adopted by the United States and Europe in the nearly six years since the Global Compacts were adopted and provides an assessment about how these receiving nations have adapted to the rising number of forcibly displaced in the world, and whether, in doing so, their policies have been consistent with the provision of both Compacts. The paper finds that: • Both the US and Europe have instituted enforcement policies that violate the spirit, if not the intent, of the two Compacts, and, in some cases, undermine international human rights standards; • Both the US and Europe have attempted to balance their enforcement-related approaches with the creation of legal avenues and immigrant integration policies, consistent with the two Compacts, but their efforts, to date, have been insufficient to the need; • The US has made significant strides in introducing policies to protect refugee-like populations, but has failed to protect asylum-seekers in need of protection who arrive at the US-Mexico border; • Europe has relied on bilateral agreements and restrictive laws to deter migrants from reaching European shores, while at the same time supported sending and transit countries with development assistance; • Both the US and Europe have a mixed record with regard to preserving the principles of the right to remain and the right to migrate, a record which must be improved in the years ahead

Christian right · Extreme right · Far right · Human rights · New Right · Political science · Politics · Radical right · Right heart · Right of way · Right to be forgotten · Right to development · Right to die · Right to education · Right to know · Right to the city · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Medicine

Tools

Open DOI