Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Not Just the Facts

Adjudicator Bias and Decisions of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (2006–2011)

Bibliographic Data

ID13089783
AuthorsInnessa Colaiacovo (John Brown University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume1
Issue4
Pages122-147
Publication date2013-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal on Migration and Human Security (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2330-2488 • E-ISSN: 2331-5024
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/233150241300100401
OpenAlexW2153602811
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited5

The Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) is Canada's largest administrative tribunal. The Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the IRB is responsible for the adjudication of refugee claims made in Canada. In accordance with its obligations under international law, Canada grants protection to persons who have a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, nationality, religion, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. In addition, a person may request protection in Canada on the basis of his or her fear of torture, risk to life or risk of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. Acceptance (approval) rates of claims vary widely across members of the IRB, with some granting asylum in less than 10 percent of cases, and others granting asylum in more than 90 percent of cases. Despite this fact, there is a lack of analysis exploring whether grant rates vary systematically in relationship to observed characteristics of adjudicators. This paper presents statistical analysis of over 68,000 refugee claims adjudicated by 264 members of the board from 2006 to 2011. It finds that the probability of acceptance is associated with individual members' characteristics including education, gender, and professional experience, when holding constant the claimant's country of origin, gender, and the year and regional office of adjudication. The findings suggest that the identity of the adjudicator affects whether or not an individual receives asylum

Adjudication · Criminology · Foreign national · Human rights · Immigration · Nationality · Persecution · Plaintiff · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Refugee law · Torture · Tribunal · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Psychology

  • Sisterhood and credible narratives

    Open Access•Diego Vaes, Samantha Bielen et al.•Social Science Research•2025

  • I Thought We Had No Rights” – Challenges in Listening, Storytelling, and Representation of LGBT Refugees

    Open Access•Katherine Fobear•Studies in Social Justice•2015

  • Trois nuances de l’expertise stratégique

    Sule Tomkinson•Politique et Sociétés•2019

  • Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism

    Moses Shayo, Asaf Zussman•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2011

  • Child Protection and Child Outcomes

    Joseph J Doyle, Joseph Doyle•American Economic Review•2007

  • Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations

    Sean Rehaag•Canadian Journal of Women and the…•2011

Citations per year0.27
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae