Crafting strategic MFA communication policies during times of political crisis
A note to MFA policy makers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13092001 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Cassidy (0009-0009-6719-4245, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Ilan Manor (0000-0003-2039-3721, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 331-343 |
| Publication date | 2016-05-26 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2334-0460 • E-ISSN: 2334-0479 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23340460.2016.1239377 |
| OpenAlex | W2548249484 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 19 |
From the power of the hashtag to frame political discourse online, to the use of online messenger services such as Whatsapp to conduct press briefings, the technological revolution has had a substantial impact on the practice of crisis communication. From their extensive reach capabilities to the instant power of connection, popular online platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram are demonstrating to their users and observers alike that the age of the digital – in particular the age of social media – has altered how we now practice and perceive the role (and power) of communication during times of political crisis. However not all has been smooth sailing, with such shifts in communication strategies creating an increasing amount of hyperbolic discourse or “myths” concerning what diplomatic actors are actually doing online. These myths have been informed by the possible or expected power of online technologies and not by what is actually happening in practice. Therefore if communication strategies are to become truly effective in the digital age, such hyperbolic discourse surrounding the technological revolution needs to be dissected and discussed. We need to separate hype from genuine transformations within the digital crisis communication arena, and move the discussion from that of an online presence focus, to one which is centred around strategic output and effectiveness. Thus situated within these changing technological shifts, this article seeks to explore a number of myths surrounding diplomatic crisis communication practice and provide a number of strategic methods on how ministries of foreign affairs (MFAs) may best move past these myths in order to create a crisis communication strategy which is effective, and measurable. At its core, this article provides MFA policy makers and practitioners with a road map for strategic crisis communication success
Business · Crisis communication · Digital media · Digital Revolution · Media studies · Mythology · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public relations · Situated · Social media · Sociology · Computer Science · History · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
WhatsApp with Diplomatic Practices in Geneva? Diplomats, Digital Technologies, and Adaptation in Practice
Cultural Identity Theory Impact in Boosting National Identity, Palestinian Media Elites’ Views
Domestic Digital Diplomacy
Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014
Empirical support for the Al-Jazeera Effect notion
Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy
Globalización y poder
Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation
Networked frame contestation from authoritarian to Western democracy – A case of China's (failed) Twiplomacy in contesting coronavirus narrative in the UK
Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump
Blended Diplomacy
Facebook diplomacy
Mediated Public Diplomacy Redefined
Digital Diplomacy
Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web
The New Public Diplomacy
Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy
Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt
Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter
National Interest Frames and Public Opinion about World Affairs
Credibility talk in public diplomacy
Public Diplomacy 2.0
Public Diplomacy and Soft Power
Real-Time Diplomacy
Studying the Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in International Crises
Digital Public Diplomacy and a Strategic Narrative for India
Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy
| Citations per year | 1.63 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |