Was the Stonehenge Altar Stone from Orkney? Investigating the mineralogy and geochemistry of Orcadian Old Red sandstones and Neolithic circle monuments

Bibliographic Data

ID13096035
AuthorsR E Bevins (0000-0002-7201-0115, Aberystwyth University, corresponding author), Nicholas J G Pearce (0000-0003-3157-9564, Aberystwyth University), Stephen Hillier (0000-0001-9652-9950, James Hutton Institute), Duncan Pirrie (0000-0002-4954-5920, University of South Wales), Rob Ixer (University College London), Sergio Andò (0000-0002-3429-2350, University of Milano-Bicocca), Marta Barbarano (0000-0001-7676-1496, University of Milano-Bicocca), Matthew Power (0000-0001-7482-4545), Peter Turner (0000-0001-6836-436X), Peter A Turner (0000-0003-0839-1408)
Year2024
Volume58
Pages104738-104738
Publication date2024-08-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Archaeological Science Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2352-409X • E-ISSN: 2352-4103
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104738
OpenAlexW4402050020
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

Recent petrological, mineralogical and geochemical investigations of the Stonehenge Altar Stone have negated its source in the Old Red Sandstone (ORS) Anglo-Welsh Basin. Further, it has been suggested that it is time to look wider, across northern Britain and Scotland, especially in areas where geological and geochemical evidence concur, and there is evidence of Neolithic communities and their monuments. In this context the islands of Orkney, with its rich Neolithic archaeology, are an obvious area worthy of investigation. The same techniques applied to investigations of the Altar Stone and ORS sequences in southern Britain have been applied to two major Neolithic monuments on Mainland Orkney, namely the Stones of Stenness and the Ring of Brodgar. In addition, field samples of ORS lithologies from the main stratigraphic horizons on Mainland Orkney have been investigated. Portable XRF analyses of the five exposed stones at the Stones of Stenness and seven of the exposed stones at the Ring of Brodgar show a wide range of compositions, having similar compositions to field samples analysed from both the Lower and Upper Stromness Flagstone formations, with the stones at Stenness appearing to have been sourced from the Upper Stromness Flagstone Formation while the Ring of Brodgar stones possibly being sourced from both formations. Examination of the mineralogy of ORS field samples and the Stonehenge Altar Stone, using a combination of X-ray diffraction, microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and automated SEM-EDS shows there to be no match between the Orkney samples and the Altar Stone. Only two samples from Orkney showed the presence of baryte, a characteristic mineral of the Altar Stone. Another key discriminant is the presence of abundant detrital K-feldspar in all of the Orkney field samples, a mineral which has only very low abundance in the Altar Stone. In addition, the regularly interstratified dioctahedral/dioctahedral smectite mineral tosudite is present in the clay mineral assemblage of the Altar Stone, but not detected in the Orkney samples. It is concluded that the Altar Stone was not sourced from Mainland Orkney, despite considerable evidence for long-distance communications between Orkney and Stonehenge around 3000/2900 BCE

Altar · Ancient history · Archaeology · Geochemistry · Geography · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Geological and Geochemical Analysis · History · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies · Geology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access