Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

More room for cohousing in the United States

Understanding diffusion potential by exploring who knows about, who likes, and who would consider living in cohousing

Bibliographic Data

ID13101322
AuthorsAngela Sanguinetti (0000-0002-9008-7175, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA, USA, corresponding author), Kathleen Hibbert (0000-0002-8603-5794, University of California, Irvine)
Year2018
Volume45
Issue3
Pages139-156
Publication date2018-09-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHousing and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2376-0923 • E-ISSN: 0888-2746
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08882746.2018.1529507
OpenAlexW2896238575
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited26

Early adopters of cohousing have been relatively homogenous in many regards. For example, most are white, politically liberal, Democrat, and have a post-graduate education; females are also overrepresented compared to the general population. Little is known about the degree to which this lack of diversity is due to lack of broader appeal, lack of awareness or access, or other factors. The present study sought to further understanding of this issue. Through a diffusion of innovations lens, we explored a wide range of potential demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal predictors of knowledge of and interest in cohousing among the general US population, via an online survey of 157 individuals. Regression analysis revealed that being older, not heterosexual, more educated, and voting in the 2012 presidential election predicted greater knowledge of cohousing, and being liberal and a working woman predicted interest in cohousing. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for understanding the profile of cohousing early adopters and potential for the movement to expand to broader segments of the US population

Appeal · Diversity (politics · Political science · Politics · Population · Presidential election · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Voting · White (mutation · Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives · Demography · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies

  • Sustainability and Sociability

    Open Access•Heidi M Berggren•Environment and Behavior•2024

  • Older Adult Residents in Cohousing Communities

    Jeanne M Koller, B Lynn Hutchings et al.•Journal of Aging and Environment•2021

  • Older Adult Residents in Cohousing Communities

    Jeanne M Koller, B Lynn Hutchings et al.•Journal of Aging and Environment•2023

  • Motivational Barriers to Shared Housing

    Open Access•Bart Put, Inge Pasteels•Housing Theory and Society•2021

  • Beyond Affordability

    Open Access•Yael Arbell•Housing Theory and Society•2021

  • Exploring perspectives on healthy housing among low-income prospective residents of a future co-housing “Microvillage” in Geelong, Australia

    Elyse Warner, Lynne Chambers et al.•Housing and Society•2022

  • Is cohousing good for democracy? Comparing political participation among residents of cohousing communities and traditional condominium developments

    Heidi M Berggren•Housing and Society•2020

  • Planning for sufficiency shared housing

    Open Access•Robert Boyers, Robert H W Boyer et al.•Urban Studies•2026

  • The Structure of Environmental Concern

    Open Access•P Wesley Schultz•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2001

  • Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction

    Jo Williams, Joanna Willams•Journal of Urban Design•2005

  • Design for Gender Equality

    Dick Urban Vestbro, Liisa Horelli•Built Environment•2012

  • A Short Social Support Measure for Patients Recovering From Myocardial Infarction

    Pamela H Mitchell, Lynda H Powell et al.•Journal of Cardiopulmonary…•2003

  • Bowling alone

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•Proceedings of the 2000 ACM…•2000

  • Intermediacy and the diffusion of grassroots innovations

    Open Access•Robert Boyers, Robert H W Boyer•Environmental Innovation and…•2018

  • Smart Growth

    Tom Daniels•Planning Practice and Research•2001

  • Older Adults’ Motivations and Expectations Toward Senior Cohousing in a Rural Community

    Mihyun Kang, Melinda Lyon et al.•Housing and Society•2012

  • Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents

    Open Access•Claire Huff, Dustin Tingley•Research & Politics•2015

  • Social support in the cohousing model of community

    Elizabeth Markle, Rachel Rodgers et al.•Community Development•2015

  • A conceptual model for aging better together intentionally

    Open Access•Anne P Glass, Rebecca S Vander Plaats•Journal of Aging Studies•2013

  • The Impact of Mutual Support Based Housing Projects on the Costs of Care

    Sarah Borgloh, Peter Westerheide•Housing Studies•2012

  • The New Urbanism

    Open Access•John Delafons•Cities•1994

  • Cohousing as Civic Society

    Open Access•Heidi M Berggren•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Predicting an American future for cohousing

    Open Access•Jo Williams, Joanna Williams et al.•Futures•2008

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl

    Open Access•Michael P Johnson•Environment and Planning A…•2001

Citations per year1.33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae