An Examination of the Inter-Rater Reliability and Rater Accuracy of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13102477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ryan M Labrecque (0000-0002-8468-1733, Portland State University, corresponding author), Christopher M Campbell (0000-0002-5443-5523, Portland State University), Jaycee Elliott (Portland State University), Megan M King (0000-0001-7081-0445, Portland State University), Molly Christmann (Portland State University), Kari Page (Portland State University), John D McVay (0000-0002-2642-8158, Multnomah County Health Department), Katie Roller (Multnomah County Health Department) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 105-118 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Corrections (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2377-4657 • E-ISSN: 2377-4665 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23774657.2017.1323253 |
| OpenAlex | W4248444191 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
Correctional agencies use risk assessment instruments for a wide range of purposes, including to help classify, manage, and treat offenders. The literature on offender risk assessment largely focuses on assessing for predictive accuracy, and far less research examines reliability in scoring. This study adds to this gap in knowledge by assessing how reliably and accurately a group of trained raters score one particular risk assessment tool, the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Findings reveal an adequate to strong level of inter-rater reliability across the domains of the LS/CMI. These results also suggest there is a wide range of rater accuracy across the items and domains of the LS/CMI. The policy and practical implications of these findings are discussed
Business · Computer security · Developmental psychology · Inter-rater reliability · Rating scale · Reliability (semiconductor · Risk assessment · Service (business · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
The Psychology of Criminal Conduct
From Nothing Works to What Works
The Risk Principle in Action
The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment
Classification for Effective Rehabilitation
Risk Principle of Case Classification in Correctional Treatment
Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data
Thirty years of research on the Level of Service Scales
Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.
The Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory
The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation
Effects of Automating Recidivism Risk Assessment on Reliability, Predictive Validity, and Return on Investment (ROI)
Automating Risk Assessment Instruments and Reliability
In the eye of the beholder? An examination of the inter-rater reliability of the LSI-R and YLS/CMI in a correctional agency
Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta‐analysis
Intraclass correlations
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |