Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Gender, Power, and Nonpreferred Contraceptive Use in the United States

Results from a National Survey

Datos Bibliográficos

ID13103544
AutoresKristen Lagasse Burke (0000-0002-1833-3722, The University of Texas at Austin), Leon Lindberg (0000-0003-2660-9407, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey)
Año2024
Volumen10
Fecha de publicación2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23780231241282641
OpenAlexW4403938725
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas68

Power dynamics in social interactions likely affect individuals’ ability to use their preferred contraception, yet research has primarily emphasized financial barriers. Using data from a national survey of people assigned female at birth, we apply a social-ecological framework to assess a broader range of factors shaping nonpreferred use. Over one-quarter of respondents were not using their preferred method; among them, nearly half preferred vasectomy, condoms, or withdrawal. Partner disagreement was the most common reason for nonpreferred use and was associated with experiencing partner contraceptive coercion. Black women, who face structural racism in the health care system, were more likely to attribute their nonpreferred use to a provider’s recommendation. These findings demonstrate how gender and power shape contraceptive use despite the preferences of those at risk of pregnancy, highlighting the need for cultural, policy, and health care shifts to resolve contraceptive preference-use discordance and increase gender equity in the responsibility of pregnancy prevention

Current Population Survey · Demographic economics · Economics · Environmental health · Family planning · National Survey of Family Growth · Physics · Population · Power (physics · Research methodology · Survey research · Applied Psychology · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Contraceptive autonomy of adolescents and young adults in the U.S. South

    Open Access•Kathleen Broussard, Leon Lindberg et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • The violence of reproductive injustice

    Open Access•Jana Niemann, Lisa Glaum et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2025

  • Differences in Contraceptive Method Discontinuation and Contraceptive Method Preferences by Disability Status

    Open Access•Zoe H Pleasure, Leon Lindberg•Women s Health Issues•2025

  • Perception of Having Enough Information to Make Contraceptive Decisions

    Open Access•Ariana H Bennett, Alex Schulte et al.•Women s Health Issues•2025

  • How Do We Measure Contraceptive Method Preferences? Evidence From a Scoping Review

    Open Access•Carolina Cardona, Jamila Asker et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low‐Income Postpartum Texans

    Open Access•J E Potter, Kristen Lagasse Burke et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2025

  • Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018

    Open Access•Peter Ueda, Catherine H Mercer et al.•JAMA Network Open•2020

  • Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy

    Open Access•J E Potter, Arthur J Stevenson et al.•Contraception•2019

  • Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making

    Open Access•Christine Dehlendorf, Kira Levy et al.•Contraception•2013

  • Under (implicit) pressure

    Open Access•Anne M Gomez, Mikaela Wapman•Contraception•2017

  • Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion

    Open Access•Daniel Stokols•American Journal of Health…•1996

  • Vasectomy Knowledge and Interest Among U.S. Men Who Do Not Intend to Have More Children

    Open Access•Kari White, Macarena Martínez Órdenes et al.•American Journal of Men s Health•2022

  • Satisfaction, Resignation, and Dissatisfaction with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Low-Income Postpartum Texans

    Open Access•Elizabeth Ela, Elizabeth J Ela et al.•Women s Health Issues•2022

  • Young Women's Experiences with Coercive and Noncoercive Condom Use Resistance

    Open Access•Kelly Cue Davis, Cynthia A Stappenbeck et al.•Women s Health Issues•2019

  • Young Women's Contraceptive Decision Making

    Open Access•Cassondra Marshall, Sylvia Guendelman et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2016

  • Barriers to Contraception and Interest In Over‐the‐Counter Access Among Low‐Income Women

    Open Access•Amanda Dennis, Daniel Grossman•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2012

  • Rights to Sexual and Reproductive Health

    Open Access•Carmel Shalev•Health and Human Rights•2000

  • National Needs of Family Planning Among US Men Aged 15 to 44 Years

    Arik V Marcell, Susannah E Gibbs et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2016

  • Pleasure, Power, and Inequality

    Jeanette A Higgins, Jenny A Higgins et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2008

  • Sexual Minority Women and Contraceptive Use

    Jeanette A Higgins, Jenny A Higgins et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Telehealth for Contraceptive Care During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Leon Lindberg, Laura D Lindberg et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2022

  • Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (Larc) Promotion and Removal

    Jeanette A Higgins, Jenny A Higgins et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2016

  • Contraceptive Autonomy

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Studies in Family Planning•2020

  • Does Choice Make a Difference to Contraceptive Use? Evidence from East Java

    Siti Pariani, David M Heer et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1991

  • Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods

    Open Access•Kristen Lagasse Burke, J E Potter•Studies in Family Planning•2023

  • Fundamental Elements of the Quality of Care

    Judith Bruce•Studies in Family Planning•1990

  • Reasons for Contraceptive Nonuse among Women Having Unmet Need for Contraception in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Gilda Sedgh, Rubina Hussain•Studies in Family Planning•2014

  • Development and Validation of a Reproductive Autonomy Scale

    Open Access•Ushma D Upadhyay, Shari L Dworkin et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2014

  • The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception

    Jeanette A Higgins, Jenny A Higgins et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2016

  • More Than a Physical Burden

    Katrina Kimport•The Journal of Sex Research•2017

  • A Qualitative Examination of Men’s Condom Use Attitudes and Resistance

    Open Access•Kelly Cue Davis, Trevor J Schraufnagel et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2014

  • Accounting for Women's Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships

    Open Access•E A Armstrong, P England et al.•American Sociological Review•2012

  • Talking about male body-based contraceptives

    Open Access•Katrina Kimport•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • The limitations of patient-centered care

    Open Access•Jamie L Manzer, Ann V Bell•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • I was obligated to accept

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Supply-Side Versus Demand-Side Unmet Need

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Nicole Maloney et al.•Population and Development Review•2022

  • Men and masculinities in qualitative research on vasectomy

    Lucy Nicholas, Christy E Newman et al.•Health Sociology Review•2021

  • Reproductive Oppression Enters the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Mieke Cw Eeckhaut, Y Hara•Socius Sociological Research for…•2023

  • Astronauts in the Sperm World

    Open Access•Nelly Oudshoorn•Men and Masculinities•2004

  • Strategic Silence

    Open Access•C Dalessandro, Laurie James-Hawkins et al.•Gender & Society•2019

  • It's those Pills that are Ruining Me

    Open Access•Krystale E Littlejohn•Gender & Society•2013

  • Men Bring Condoms, Women Take Pills

    Open Access•Jon Fennell, Julie Lynn Fennell•Gender & Society•2011

  • Hegemonic Masculinity

    Open Access•R Connell, R W Connell et al.•Gender & Society•2005

  • Gendered Divisions of Fertility Work

    Open Access•Andrea M Bertotti•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2013

  • Gender and risk assessment in contraceptive technologies

    Open Access•Jessika Van Kammen, Nelly Oudshoorn•Sociology of Health & Illness•2002

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año6
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae