Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Do People Avoid Discussing Science and Religion on Social Media? Findings from a National Sample

Bibliographic Data

ID13103603
AuthorsEszter Hargittai (0000-0003-4199-4868, University of Zurich), Esther Gasser (0009-0004-1144-4069, University of Zurich), Laura Magó (University of Zurich), Becca Smith (0000-0002-2697-1513, University of Zurich)
Year2024
Volume10
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23780231241275430
OpenAlexW4405479106
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

Social media is increasingly important for discussing a myriad of topics, including the sometimes contentious topics of science and religion. Although existing work on why people avoid conversations on social media has put forth some specific reasons, little such research has focused on these important topical domains, domains that sociologists have identified as having a complex relationship. Additionally, rarely have such questions been investigated on representative samples that make generalizations possible. This article fills a gap in the literature by analyzing survey responses from a national sample of 2,505 American adults collected in 2023 to explore what reasons people give for avoiding discussions about science and religion on social media. In addition to presenting the relative importance of various reasons for people staying away from such discussions, analyses also consider how sociodemographic characteristics, religiosity, and science literacy relate to whether people avoid such conversations in online environments

Media studies · Political science · Sample (material · Social media · Social science · Sociology · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Law · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Unequal Pathways

    Open Access•Jennifer M Ashlock, Zeynep Tufekci•Socius Sociological Research for…•2026

  • What Are You Talking about? Discussion Frequency of Issues Captured in Common Survey Questions

    Open Access•Turgut Keskintürk, Kevin Kiley et al.•Sociological Science•2025

  • Chemie in cyberspace

    Berend Smit•Chemie in cyberspace•1999

  • The Pipeline of Online Participation Inequalities

    Aaron Shaw, Eszter Hargittai•Journal of Communication•2018

  • Online tie and content management and changing religious identity among Muslim Arab women in Israel

    Aysha Agbarya, Nicholas A John•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Religion vs. Science

    E H Ecklund, C P Scheitle•Religion vs. science•2017

  • Doctrinal dialogues

    Katherine Judd•Mental Health Religion & Culture•2019

  • Beyond just politics

    Open Access•Christoph Lutz, Christian Pieter Hoffmann et al.•First Monday•2014

  • Individual Religiosity and Orientation towards Science

    Open Access•David Johnson, C P Scheitle et al.•Sociological Science•2015

  • A social safety net? Rejection sensitivity and political opinion sharing among young people in social media

    Open Access•Emma A Renström, Emma Bäck et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • The Participation Divide Among “Online Experts”

    Open Access•Teresa Correa•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2010

  • Are We All Online Content Creators Now? Web 2.0 and Digital Divides

    Open Access•David R Brake•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • Networks and Selective Avoidance

    Open Access•Matthew Barnidge, C Peacock et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2022

  • Connecting Interpersonal and Mass Communication

    Brian G Southwell, Alicia Torres•Communication Monographs•2006

  • Science and Religion in (Global) Public Life

    Open Access•E H Ecklund•Journal of the American Academy…•2021

  • Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency

    Albert Bandura•American Psychologist•1982

  • What Can I Do? How to Use Social Media to Improve Democratic Society

    Emily K Vraga•Political Communication•2019

  • "The "Nasty Effect

    Open Access•Andrew A Anderson, Dominique Brossard et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • Social Network Sites

    Open Access•Drick Boyd, Danah M Boyd et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2007

  • Doesn't Seem Like a Place to Interact, or Interact Well

    Open Access•Will Marler, Eszter Hargittai•Socius Sociological Research for…•2023

  • Testing a Digital Inequality Model for Online Political Participation

    Open Access•Moritz Büchi, Florian Vogler•Socius Sociological Research for…•2017

  • What Will They Think If I Post This? Risks and Returns for Political Expression Across Platforms

    Open Access•Elnaz Parviz, Cameron W Piercy•Social Media + Society•2021

  • Religion and Science

    John H Evans, Michael S Evans•Annual Review of Sociology•2008

  • Epistemological and Moral Conflict Between Religion and Science

    Open Access•John H Evans•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2011

  • Baring Their Souls in Online Profiles or Not? Religious Self-Disclosure in Social Media

    Open Access•Piotr S Bobkowski, Lisa D Pearce•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2011

  • Political Identity and Confidence in Science and Religion in the United States

    Open Access•Timothy L O’brien, Noy et al.•Sociology of Religion•2020

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae