Ambivalence in the “New Positivism” for the Philosophy of Communication
The Problem of Communication and Communicating Subjects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13106147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ed McLuskie (0009-0005-1144-6547, Boise State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 255-269 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Annals of the International Communication Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2380-8977 • E-ISSN: 2380-8985 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23808985.2001.11678989 |
| OpenAlex | W2501481208 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
The philosophy of communication in the United States grew out of a reaction to positivist approaches to communication research, which had managed to render processes of communication anonymous through the eradication of the epistemological subject. Although the pursuits varied among founding proponents of a “philosophy of communication” within the International Communication Association, the concepts nevertheless displayed partisanship for conceptualizations of communication that included communicating subjects. After the early responses to positivism, however, a “new positivism” emerged that challenged that vision. Linked to postmodernist developments in other fields, it joined the old positivist skepticism that subtracted epistemological subjects from knowledge by suggesting a path that would subtract “communicating subjects” and even “communication” from the work of the “philosophy of communication.” Most recently, the new positivism has produced ambivalence over the prospects for communication with communicating subjects. In this essay the author concludes that this ambivalence signals a reconsideration of postmodern influences on the philosophy of communication, as well as the return of communication with communicating subjects
Ambivalence · Communication studies · Epistemology · Positivism · Postmodernism · Skepticism · Social science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology
The New Conservatism
Reflexive Modernization
Critical Communication Studies
A Reply to my Critics
Discipline and Punish
The end of organized capitalism
The Birth of the Clinic
The Jobless Future
Cultural Studies as Critical Theory
Speech Act Phenomenology
Repopulating the Depopulated Pages of Social Psychology
Against Transformations of Communication into Control
Communication—Embrace the Subject, not the Field
Critical Communication Research at the Crossroads
Genealogical Notes on “The Field”
Modernity and Self-Identity
Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment
Towards a theory of communicative competence
Perspectives on a Discipline
Redeeming Modernity
Does Communication Theory Need Intersubjectivity? Toward an Immanent Philosophy of Interpersonal Relations
Social Action Media Studies
Historicizing “reason”
The spaces of public dissension
Communication Theory, Research and the Practical Affairs of Man
Post-Marxism or Beyond
Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Beyond Cultural Studies— Recovering the "Political" in Critical Communication Studies
Against a Science of Human Communication
The birth of the clinic
Erkenntnis und Interesse
The Mass Media and Democracy
The condition of postmodernity
Can Cultural Studies Find True Happiness in Communication
The Postmodern Condition
The Rise of Systems Theory
Mind, Self, and Society
Dialectic of Enlightenment
Postmodernism as Social Theory
Media sociology
Doing postmodernism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|