Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cybersecurity Capacity

Does It Matter

Bibliographic Data

ID13106331
AuthorsWilliam H Dutton (0000-0002-0141-6804, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Sadie Creese (0000-0002-2414-9657, Science Oxford), Ruth Shillair (0000-0003-0341-9096, Michigan State University), Maria Bada (0000-0003-0741-5199, University of Cambridge)
Year2019
Volume9
Pages280-306
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Information Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2381-5892 • E-ISSN: 2158-3897
PublisherThe Pennsylvania State University Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5325/jinfopoli.9.2019.0280
OpenAlexW3123887951
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited13

National cybersecurity capacity building involves the development of managerial, technical, social, legal, policy, and regulatory initiatives by a growing ecology of actors to enhance the resilience of nations to cybersecurity breaches, cybercrime, and terrorism. Capacity building is therefore resource intensive, requiring attention across sectors of society, ranging from governments to Internet users. However, it is difficult to justify commitments to capacity building when the benefits of building national cybersecurity capacity are largely based on logical reasoning, limited case studies, anecdotal evidence, and expert opinion rather than systematic empirical evidence. To explore the value of capacity building, this article reports on the early phase of a systematic effort to bring together cross-national data from multiple sources to examine whether indicators related to the cybersecurity capacity of a nation help explain the experiences of Internet users—one of the final payoffs of cybersecurity capacity building

Business · Capacity building · Computer security · Cybercrime · Empirical evidence · Political science · Public relations · Resilience (materials science · The Internet · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Information and Cyber Security · Law

  • Et forsvar i digital krise

    Open Access•Tormod Heier, Bjørn E Mobech-Hanssen•Internasjonal politikk•2020

  • Resilience to cyber-enabled foreign interference

    Rob Manwaring, Josh Holloway•Defence Studies•2022

  • Advancing cyber diplomacy in the Asia Pacific

    Mark Bryan Manantan•Australian Journal Of International…•2021

  • Mapping the landscape of cybersecurity preparedness

    Open Access•Songkhun Nillasithanukroh, Chan-Ho Park et al.•Technology in Society•2025

  • Seeding the cloud

    Open Access•Johann Ole Willers•Public Administration•2021

  • Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling

    Open Access•Jörg Henseler, Marko Sarstedt•Computational Statistics•2013

  • Structural equation modeling in medical research

    Open Access•Tanya N Beran, Tanya Beran et al.•BMC Research Notes•2010

  • Trust in the Internet as an experience technology

    William H Dutton, Adrian Shepherd et al.•Information Communication & Society•2006

  • Experience with New Tools and Infrastructures of Research

    Open Access•William H Dutton, Eric T Meyer•Prometheus•2009

  • Cautions Regarding the Interpretation of Regression Coefficients and Hypothesis Tests in Linear Models with Interactions

    Andrew F Hayes, Carroll J Glynn et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2012

  • Age and Trust in the Internet

    Open Access•Grant Blank, William H Dutton•Social Science Computer Review•2011

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,83
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae