Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Impact of Local Participation on Community Support for Natural Resource Management

The Case of Mining in Northern Canada and Northern Sweden

Bibliographic Data

ID13108347
AuthorsC Jager (0000-0001-5491-8819, corresponding author), Simon Matti (0000-0001-7646-1813), Greg Poelzer (0000-0003-3023-6471), Stan Yu
Year2018
Volume9
Pages124-147
Publication date2018-06-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArctic review on law and politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2387-4562 • E-ISSN: 2387-4562
PublisherCappelen Damm Akademisk (PUBLISHER • NO)
DOI10.23865/arctic.v9.730
OpenAlexW2807571799
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited10

Due to its oftentimes complex, contested, and multi-scale character, natural resource management (NRM) tends to be a challenging task that has been met with various political approaches in order to meet demands for legitimacy. One approach to enhancing the legitimacy of NRM that has gained increased attention within the academic literature is the adoption of local participatory democracy in decision-making processes. Advocates of participatory democracy in NRM propose that local participation achieves the following outcomes: increased legitimacy because it ensures that local needs and priorities are successfully met; decision-making based on more complete information, which helps avoid unexpected negative outcomes; and a sense of belonging and influence among the public, leading to increased perceptions of support and partnership, as opposed to NRM which is imposed on the community. Nevertheless, comprehensive empirical studies that document how public participation affects legitimacy remain rare. Using 2015 data collected on people’s attitudes towards mining in northern Saskatchewan, Canada, and Norrbotten and Västerbotten counties, Sweden, this paper empirically assesses whether and how perceptions of local participation affect the legitimacy of mining development. In turn, this paper finds that perceived public participation does affect the public’s propensity to support mining development and this propensity is mediated by people’s perceptions of the interests present in the decision-making process, their normative beliefs concerning which actors should be allowed to participate in the decision-making process, and certain individual-level and contextual-level factors

Citizen journalism · Democracy · Empirical research · General partnership · Legitimacy · Local community · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Normative · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Resource (disambiguation · Sociology · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Psychology · Public Administration

  • Undermining Assessment

    Warren Max Bernauer, Warren Bernauer et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2023

  • Include Chiefs, Increase Legitimacy? Local Perceptions of Conservation Management

    Open Access•Moa Dahlberg, Simon Matti et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2026

  • Mineral extraction in Swedish Sápmi

    Open Access•Kaisa Raitio, Christina Allard et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Sustainable development and sacrifice in the rural North

    Open Access•Arvid Stiernström•Sociologia Ruralis•2023

  • Development on whose terms?

    Open Access•Emma Gilberthorpe, Glenn Banks•Resources Policy•2012

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•2015

  • Why do some communities resist mining projects while others do not

    Open Access•Marta Conde, Philippe Le Billon•The Extractive Industries and…•2017

  • Understanding ‘successful’ conflict resolution

    Open Access•Heli Saarikoski, Kaisa Raitio et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Roy Marsh et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2004

  • The Global Gold Mining Industry, Junior Firms, and Civil Society Resistance in Guatemala

    Open Access•Michael L Dougherty•Bulletin of Latin American Research•2011

  • Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation

    Open Access•Mark E Warren, Mark Warren•American Political Science Review•1992

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae