Identifying and closing gaps in corporate reporting of ocean impacts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13109529 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jean‐baptiste Jouffray (0000-0002-4105-6372, Stockholm Resilience Centre, corresponding author), John Virdin (0000-0002-0882-3402, Duke University), Jan Bebbington (0000-0001-7251-1780, Lancaster University), Robert Blasiak (0000-0002-0888-0159, Stockholm Resilience Centre), A Dunchus (Duke University), Massimo Presti (Duke University), Jeremy Pare (Duke University), D Prosi (European University Institute), Juliana Quintero (0000-0003-3005-4184, Duke University), Richard E Rosenthal (Duke University), Paolo Tortora (0000-0001-9259-7673, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques), Daniel Vermeer (0000-0001-8738-2862, Duke University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1371-1380 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nature Sustainability (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2398-9629 • E-ISSN: 2398-9629 |
| Publisher | Nature Portfolio (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-025-01631-8 |
| OpenAlex | W4414064881 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 56 |
As ocean industrialization accelerates, corporate transparency is increasingly seen as critical to improve governance, yet little is known about how firms disclose their impacts on marine ecosystems. This study addresses that gap through a content analysis of sustainability and annual reports from 75 of the largest companies across 8 sectors of the ocean economy. We examine which impacts are reported, how they are measured and whether firms set related targets. Most companies focus narrowly on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, with limited attention to more ocean-specific impacts, for which fewer than 25% of firms have metrics and targets. Where measurements are reported, the use of 443 distinct indicators limits comparability and suggests a lack of consensus on what should be disclosed. Amid growing demands for corporate accountability, our findings provide a timely benchmark to support the integration of ocean-specific considerations into reporting frameworks and to guide materiality assessments that better reflect the environmental realities of the ocean economy
Closing (real estate · Comparability · Corporate sustainability · Greenhouse gas · Materiality (auditing · Sustainability · Sustainability reporting · Transparency (behavior · Coastal and Marine Management · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Marine and fisheries research
Full Disclosure
The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process
Transnational Corporations as ‘Keystone Actors’ in Marine Ecosystems
Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship
Environmental Governance in the Information Age
The qualitative content analysis process
Blue growth and blue justice
Making sense of firms for ocean governance
Essential environmental impact variables
The Blue Acceleration
Operationalizing transformative change for business in the context of Nature Positive
Ecosystems are showing symptoms of resilience loss
The ocean genome and future prospects for conservation and equity
Biodiversity reporting
Framing the Blue Economy
Infotopia
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |