Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13111478 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Wolfe (0000-0002-4517-6056, University of Lausanne, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 257-273 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning C Politics and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2399-6544 • E-ISSN: 2399-6552 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23996544221129409 |
| OpenAlex | W4296642227 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 38 |
Many cities have abandoned plans for hosting the Olympics due to crises of high costs, unnecessary infrastructures, and a range of socio-spatial exclusions. These problems stem from conflicts between the short-term needs of the event and the long-term needs of the city. In response, Olympic organizers launched a series of reforms to improve alignment between the Games and the host city. This paper examines these reforms, identifies urban development agendas in preparation for Paris 2024, and explores their implications on selected spaces of urban intervention within Paris. Thinking through rhizomatic philosophy, the paper advocates for a more nuanced approach to exploring the problems and potential of mega-event-led urban development. In so doing, the paper maps organizer and activist assemblages, and posits that efforts at reform are stymied by a too-narrow interpretation of who counts as a stakeholder. Subsequently, the spatial articulations of the mega-event risk perpetuating the exclusions that reform intended to resolve. Ensuring a wider representation of resident voices could help minimize the distance between word and deed in the latest rounds of Olympic reform
Deed · Event (particle physics · Global city · Interpretation (philosophy · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Representation (politics · Sociology · Stakeholder · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports, Gender, and Society
Rebordering the banlieue
The regulatory network of Olympic stakeholders
Legacy and urban regeneration
The achievement of sustainability and legacies by the host cities of the Summer Olympiads, 2012–2024
Is urban planning returning to the past in search of a sustainable future? Exploring the six Paris and London Olympic Games (1900–2024)
In Conclusion, What Next for the Olympic Cities
Do projects learn across space and time? Evidence from the Olympics
The juggernaut endures
Abandoning legacy
Thinking Space
The Palgrave Handbook of Olympic Studies
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
Events and Urban Regeneration
Understanding the Olympics
The declining appeal of mega-events in entrepreneurial cities
An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games
Mapping the Olympic growth machine
Reading the Right to the City
On context
It's not for us’
Assemblage and critical urbanism
The privatisation of urban development and the London Olympics 2012
Projecting the Metropolis
Hosting major sports events
What makes an event a mega-event? Definitions and sizes
Fast Activism
Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games
Parables for the Virtual
Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations
Gentrifications in pre-Olympic Rio de Janeiro
Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory
Fragile growth coalitions or powerful contestations? Cancelled Olympic bids in Boston and Hamburg
Going for the Gold
International Events and Mass Evictions
Regression to the tail
Assembling Urbanism
You're making our city look bad
Comparing the Urban Impacts of the Fifa World Cup and Olympic Games From 2010 to 2016
Sanitizing Public Space in Olympic Host Cities
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |