Reimagining direct democracy as an intersection of different forms of representation

Bibliographic Data

ID13112531
AuthorsMatija Miloš (0000-0002-3839-0273, University of Rijeka, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume11
Issue1
Pages69-92
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePravni zapisi (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2406-1387 • E-ISSN: 2217-2815
PublisherFaculty of Agronomy in Čačak (PUBLISHER • RS)
DOI10.5937/pravzap0-26102
OpenAlexW3046563967
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

As an exceptional device in the life of contemporary constitutional democracies, direct democracy is normally considered to be separate from representation. In this paper, I explore this well-established divide, asking how it interacts with our understanding of the central subject of direct democracy, the people. I show how theorizing that takes its cue from the dichotomy between "absence" and "presence", ascribed to the separation of representation and forms of direct democracy, is tied with identifying the active electorate and the people. On the other hand, this approach is inept for comprehending the ways representations of the people are produced and instrumentalized in the wake of direct democracy. In this paper, I suggest that this phenomenon may be approached by examining how direct democracy is entangled with representing "the people" through arguments, processes and constructs

Cartography · Democracy · Direct democracy · Epistemology · Geography · Intersection (aeronautics · Phenomenon · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Representative democracy · Sociology · Subject (documents · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access