Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Embracing Urban Micromobility

A Comparative Study of E-Scooter Adoption in Washington, D.C., Miami, and Los Angeles

Bibliographic Data

ID13113229
AuthorsMostafa Jafarzadehfadaki (0000-0001-5052-7458, University of Alabama at Birmingham, corresponding author), Virginia P Sisiopiku (0000-0003-4262-8990, University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Year2024
Volume8
Issue2
Pages71-71
Publication date2024-06-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2413-8851 • E-ISSN: 2413-8851
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/urbansci8020071
OpenAlexW4399773982
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited56

E-scooters have emerged as a popular micromobility option for short trips, with many cities embracing shared e-scooters to enhance convenience for travelers and reduce reliance on automobiles. Despite their rising popularity, there is a lack of clear understanding of how user preferences and adoption practices vary by location. This study aims to explore user and non-user attitudes towards e-scooter use in diverse urban settings. A meta-analysis of data from three surveys (N = 1197) conducted in Washington, D.C., Miami, FL, and Los Angeles, CA, was performed to compare e-scooter users and non-user profiles, mode choice factors, and attitudes and preferences towards e-scooter use. Additionally, machine learning (ML) and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis were utilized to identify influential factors in predicting e-scooter use in each city. The results reveal that the majority of e-scooter users are 25 to 39 of age, male, with higher income and a bachelor’s degree, and 92% possess a driver’s license. Significant differences in attitudes between e-scooter users and non-users highlight the complexity of perceptions towards e-scooter usage. The ML model indicates that employment status negatively impacts the prediction of e-scooter users, while factors such as living without a car and using non-motorized modes positively influence e-scooter use. Educational background is a significant e-scooter mode choice factor in Washington, D.C. and Miami, whereas attitudinal questions on car and technology usage are influential in Los Angeles. These findings provide valuable insights into the factors shaping e-scooter adoption, informing urban transportation planning and policymaking and enhancing understanding of shared micromobility and its impact on urban mobility

Environmental health · Miami · Political science · Environmental Science · Medicine · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Gerontology

  • Urban Aviation

    Open Access•Graham Wild•Urban Science•2024

  • Revealing Spatial Patterns of Dockless Shared Micromobility

    Open Access•Štefan Gábor, Ladislav Novotný et al.•Urban Science•2025

  • Understanding electric scooter safety through driver's lens using protection motivation theory

    Open Access•Kuldeep Singh Sodha, Oliver Hall et al.•Cities•2026

  • Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis

    William Kruskal, William H Kruskal et al.•Journal of the American…•1952

  • User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles

    Open Access•Chana Joanne Haboucha, Robert Ishaq et al.•Transportation Research Part C:…•2017

  • Random Forests

    Open Access•Leo Breiman•Machine Learning•2001

  • Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber

    Open Access•Kostas Mouratidis•Sustainable Cities and Society•2022

  • Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction

    Open Access•Jonas De Vos, Patricia L Mokhtarian et al.•Transportation•2016

  • Travel mode choice

    Open Access•Joachim Scheiner, Christian Holz‐rau•Transportation•2007

  • Values, attitudes and travel behavior

    Open Access•Marcel Paulssen, Dirk Temme et al.•Transportation•2014

  • New Micromobility Means of Transport

    Open Access•Margherita Pazzini, Leonardo Cameli et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Understanding Users’ Perceptions of Bicycle-Sharing Systems in Chinese Cities

    Open Access•Yi Zhu, Wanchen Diao et al.•Urban Science•2023

  • Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh

    Open Access•Tim Ryley•Journal of Transport Geography•2005

  • Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in Spanish urban areas

    Open Access•Álvaro Aguilera-García, Juan Gomez et al.•Cities•2020

  • Examination of trust and sustainability concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption

    Open Access•Taşkın Dirsehan, Ceren Can•Technology in Society•2020

  • Notes on the practices and appearances of e-scooter users in public space

    Open Access•Sylvaine Tuncer, E Laurier et al.•Journal of Transport Geography•2020

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae