Smart, Sustainable, Resilient, and Inclusive Cities
Integrating Performance Assessment Indicators into an Ontology-Oriented Scheme in Support of the Urban Planning Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13113276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Μαρία Παναγιωτοπούλου (0000-0003-4016-5486, National Technical University of Athens), Anastasia Stratigea (0000-0002-8354-1317, National Technical University of Athens, corresponding author), Margarita Kokla (0000-0002-0369-7099, National Technical University of Athens) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 33-33 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2413-8851 • E-ISSN: 2413-8851 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/urbansci9020033 |
| OpenAlex | W4407086506 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
The unprecedented pace of urbanization has been exerting significant strain on cities, raising critical concerns across environmental, economic, social, and technological aspects. In response, the ‘Smart City’ concept has emerged as a novel urban development paradigm, aiming at addressing contemporary urban issues, enhancing cities’ competitiveness and prosperity, and fostering active participation through the strategic utilization of state-of-the-art technologies. However, the smart city term suffers from considerable conceptual ambiguity, thereby provoking intense confusion and misunderstanding among interested parties and leading to the implementation of ineffective initiatives. Moreover, the priorities of sustainability, resilience, and inclusiveness have gained prominence in the urban planning discourse, necessitating a more integrated view that aligns urban targets with performance assessment across various domains. In light of these issues, this study endeavors to clarify the above-mentioned conceptual vagueness by developing a holistic, indicator-oriented smart city ontology. The proposed knowledge representation scheme is intended to serve as a Decision Support Tool that will facilitate policymakers to tackle urban challenges and formulate sound policies. Additionally, it is expected to contribute to the fields of spatial and developmental planning by establishing a standardized framework for assessing and monitoring cities’ performance, while elucidating the complex interrelationships and trade-offs among diverse urban dimensions
Ambiguity · Business · Civil engineering · Computer security · Conceptual framework · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Knowledge management · Management science · Pace · Process management · Prosperity · Smart city · Social science · Sociology · Sustainability · Urban planning · Urban resilience · Urbanization · Vagueness · Computer Science · Engineering · Smart Cities and Technologies · Artificial Intelligence
Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative
Understanding Smart Cities
Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions
Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing
Indicator-based urban sustainability—A review
A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets
The Global City
Improving public participation in spatial planning with Web 2.0 tools
Tools and Technologies for Planning the Development of Smart Cities
Smart cities
Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities
The application of urban sustainability indicators – A comparison between various practices
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |